Perioperative analgesic effects of oral firocoxib following cautery disbudding were investigated in preweaned calves. Twenty Holstein calves approximately 4 to 6wk old received a single oral dose of firocoxib, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory, at 0.5mg/kg (n=10) or placebo (n=10) in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Responses, including ocular temperature determined by infrared thermography, pressure algometry measuring mechanical nociception threshold, and heart rate, were evaluated at 2, 4, 7, 8, and 24h after cornual nerve block and cautery disbudding. Blood samples were collected over 96h and analyzed for plasma cortisol and substance P concentrations by RIA. Additionally, ex vivo prostaglandin E2 concentrations were determined over a 72-h study period using an enzyme immunoassay. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with repeated measures. An inhibition of ex vivo prostaglandin E2 synthesis was observed from 12 to 48h following disbudding in calves treated with firocoxib. Cautery disbudding was associated with an increased nociception for the duration of sampling (24h). During the initial 24-h period following disbudding, no difference in response between treatment groups was noted. Following 24h, mean cortisol concentrations diverged between the 2 study groups with placebo-treated calves having increased cortisol concentrations at approximately 48h after disbudding. Furthermore, the overall integrated cortisol response as calculated as area under the effect curve tended to be reduced in firocoxib-treated calves. The prolonged effects of cautery dehorning require further investigation. Moreover, the effect of firocoxib on cortisol reduction observed in this study requires additional exploration.

of the slow fibre spectra were not. The latter could be fitted with two Lorentzian components. In all cases the mean end-plate current was proportional to total induced noise variance.4. Two mechanisms which might account for the response differences were identified and tested in a fashion independent of specific molecular kinetics. The different responses do not arise from separate ion-selective channels for the permeant ions at slow fibre end-plates and seem unlikely to derive from separate populations of synaptic and extrasynaptic channels.

We conclude that cannabis use increases the propofol dose required for satisfactory clinical induction when inserting a laryngeal mask.

There is a considerable range in the dose of many drugs that is required to produce a given pharmacological effect in an individual patient. This individual variation in dose requirement is sometimes reflected in the wide scatter in the steady state plasma concentration that follows the same oral dose of a drug given to any group of subjects. Such individual differences are largely due to variation in the rate of elimination of drugs. Gastrointestinal disease may also alter oral dose requirements by producing variation in both the amount and rate of drug absorption. These changes may be reflected in the plasma concentration/time curve that follows an oral dose. The amount of drug abosorbed is simultaneously affected by many factors. These include the physicochemical properties of the drug and the physiological factors that operate within the gut, as well as the presence of other substances such as food, or interaction with other drugs in the gut. The availability of the drug within the intestinal lumen is largely governed by its dissolution characteristics, particularly factors which can interfere with dissolution of the drug product in the gut. Physiological factors within the gut that affect oral drug absorption include gastric emptying rate and intestinal motility, the pH of the gastrointestinal fluids, the activity of gastrointestinal drug metabolising enzymes (e.g. monoamine oxidase and dopa decarboxylase) or drug metabolising bacteria and the surface area of the gut. Many factors affect gastric emptying. These include disease, surgery and other drugs. A change in the rate of gastric emptying alters the rate of drug delivery from the stomach to the duodenum and upper small intestine. This may profoundly alter the plasma concentration/time curve that follows oral administration of many drugs. For some drugs, proximal jejunal disease may reduce, delay or increase the apparent amount of drug absorbed. Reduced absorption of an antibiotic leads to a fall in the peak plasma concentration. If the peak falls below the minimum inhibitory concentration for a particular organism then therapeutic failure may occur, if it is assumed that the peak plasma concentration is all important for antimicrobial activity. Excessive drug absorption may lead to drug toxicity. Abnormal drug absorption is a feature of lower small intestinal conditions such as Crohn's disease. This suggests that drug absorption is not confined to the jejunum but continues throughout the small intestine. It is not always possible to predict the pattern of drug malabsorption from a knowledge of the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of the drug and the pathophysiology of the disease. The rate and amount of drug absorbed be one patient may differ from that in another patient with the same condtion. Although these differences reflect normal individual variation, they are also related to the extent and activity of disease at the time of study...

1Plasma levels of propranolol and practolol were measured in groups of elderly and young subjects, after the oral administration of propranolol (40 mg) and practolol (200 mg) on separate occasions. 2 At all sampling times the mean plasma propranolol level in the group of elderly subjects was substantially greater than the corresponding level in the group of young subjects, there being a significant difference between the two, and a fourfold difference in the mean peak levels. 3 After practolol, there was no significant difference between the mean plasma concentrations of the drug in the two groups for the first 2 hours. Subsequently, the mean plasma levels in the group of elderly subjects were somewhat higher than the corresponding levels in the young group, the differences between the two reaching significance. 4 It is suggested that there is a need to substantially reduce the dose of propranolol given to elderly patients. With practolol, however, no reduction is necessary providing renal function is normal for the patient's age.