Methods Women were stratified by age: <50, 50-64, 65-79, and ≥80 years. Differences in survival and treatment patterns were analysed between age groups. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to examine treatment patterns. KaplanMeier and Cox proportional hazards survival methods were used to assess survival.Main outcome measures Vital status from the date of diagnosis until death, censoring or last follow-up. ResultsThe final study group consisted of 8553 women, 1806 (21.12%) <50 years, 2141 (25.03%) 50-64 years, 2585 (30.22%) 65-79 years, and 2021 (23.63%) >80 years old. After adjusting for patient and tumour characteristics, older women were less likely to have surgery and more likely to receive radiotherapy. Compared with women under 50 years, women 50-64 had a two-fold higher risk of death (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.55-2.34); those 65-79 years had a four-fold higher risk of death (HR 4.01,, and those ≥80 years had a seven-fold higher risk of death (HR 6.98,). These trends stayed relatively constant over the time periods studied.Conclusions Women over 50 years are at a higher risk of vulvar cancer-specific mortality, which increases with age. These trends stayed relatively constant over the time periods studied.

No abstract

No abstract

Objectives The purpose was to compare robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TRH), laparoscopic assisted hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) with surgical staging +/- lymphadenectomy for the management of uterine cancer. Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained and patient characteristics, pathologic data, and data related to the surgical procedure were collected from chart review. Data were analyzed with SAS statistical software. Results A total of 102 TRHs were compared to 115 TLHs and 79 TAHs. There were more grade I and endometrial intraepithelial (EIN) lesions in the preoperative pathology of TLHs (P < 0.01). Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 71 (70%) TRH, 46 (58%) TAH, and 28 (24%) TLH cases (P < 0.01). Mean surgical time was 203, 133 and 132 minutes for TRHs, TLHs, and TAHs (P < 0.05). Estimated blood loss was 69, 86, and 215 ml for TRH, TLH, and TAH (P < 0.05). Blood transfusions were 19% in TAHs versus 3% and 2% in TLHs and TRHs (P < 0.01). There were fewer wound infections (2% vs. 10%) in TRHs versus TAHs (P < 0.01). Length of stay was shorter for the TRH and TLH groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion Despite longer surgical times, benefits of minimally invasive technology included shortened length of stay, decreased wound infections, transfusions, and blood loss. In our population, procedure selection for TLH versus TRH may have been influenced by lower preoperative grade, with reservation of robotic technology for cases anticipated to be more complex, and therefore justifying increased technology costs and operating times.