This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights, Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Appendices A and B. Information has been collected from DOE Orders and DOE documents; US Department of Transportation (DOT), US. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations; and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) standards and other international documents. The definitions included in this guide may not always be a regulatory definition but are the more common DOE usage. In addition, the definitions vary among regulatory agencies. It is, therefore, suggested that if a definition is to be used in a regulatory or a legal compliance issue, the definition should be verified with the appropriate regulation. To assist in locating definitions in the regulations, a listing of all definition sections in the regulations are included in Appendix B. In many instances, the appropriate regulatory reference is indicated in the right-hand margin. DOE Orders for packaging and transportation are included in the reference section. For completeness, all DOE Orders are listed in Appendix A. This resource guide will be reviewed annually for updating. Suggestions for improvement (additions or deletions) are encouraged, these should be sent to Miriam.

No abstract

You are charged with responsibility for this copy of ORNL/TM-12684, entitled Regulatory Facility Guide for Tennessee. If new or revised pages are issued, you are responsible for inserting the new pages and destruction of superseded pages.

Part 4 -RFG Preferred Routes and Maps 4.1 Alabama Preferred Routes 4.1.1 Alabama Preferred Routes Map 4.2 Arizona Preferred Routes 4.2.1 Arizona Preferred Routes Map 4.3 Arkansas Preferred Routes 4.3.1 Arkansas Preferred Routes Map 4.4 California Preferred Routes 4.4.1 California Preferred Routes Map 4.4.2 Southern California Preferred Routes Map 4.4.3 Northern California Preferred Routes Map 4.5 Colorado Preferred Routes 4.5.1 Colorado Preferred Routes Map 4.5.2 Colorado (Denver and vicinity) Preferred Routes Map

If there is one question which concerns members of the general public most about generating nucioar power, it is the question of risk. Proliferation, resource availability and all the other matters which are treated in this and previous symposia, are of interest to the general public, but probably only in a limited way. As a result, I will discuss the important topic of risk to human health in this presentation. One of the key questions in discussing the risks associated with nuclear power or any other energy system is, compared to what? That is, it is not too useful to say that there are so many man-days lost or deaths per megawatt-year, because that number will not mean much to many people. We gather most of what we know about the world in comparing things or ideas. So it is with risk. The risks we calculate mean most when they are compared to other risks. This paper is divided into two parts. The first part is based on a study (1) done previously, comparing the risks of 11 different anergy systems, including light-water nuclear power. The information presented in Ret. 1 is brought up to date as necessary.