Background: This study aimed to assess the validity of a qualitative score derived from a nutritional screening tool when used by a dietitian or nurse against physical markers of nutritional status. Methods: A screening tool designed for elderly patients in use at St John's Hospital was evaluated. Using this, scores derived by dietitian and nurse were compared with physical measurements used in nutritional assessment. The agreement between scores in each of the five categories of the tool (clinical condition, body weight, dietary intake, ability to eat and mental condition) was determined. Results: Sixty-six subjects (19 male, 47 female, mean age 78.5 years) were recruited. Undernutrition was found in 23% (n=15) of the patient population (Ζ80% of reference values for one or more physical measurements of nutritional status). A significant correlation between the qualitative score derived by the dietitian using the screening tool and physical markers of nutritional status was evident (body weight expressed as ideal body weight r=0.36, P< 0.005 and arm muscle circumference r=0.53, P< 0.001). Using the screening tool 85% of the under-nourished patients were correctly classified as nutritionally 'at risk' by the dietitian; however, only 58% were correctly identified by the nurse. There was no agreement between scores from the dietitian and nurse in any of the five scoring categories. Conclusion: These results show that the nurse failed to identify over 40% of atrisk patients when using the screening tool. The lack of agreement between dietitian and nurse within each scoring category may suggest fundamental differences in assessing factors contributing to nutritional risk by these two professions.
Septic arthritis has been regarded as rare in haemophiliacs, but its incidence may have increased since HIV infection has become widespread in these patients. We describe six cases treated at one haemophffia unit over a two-year period and discuss their investigation, diagnosis and treatment. Four of the patients were seropositive to anti-HIV.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.