The potential impact of biofilm on healing in acute and chronic wounds is one of the most controversial current issues in wound care. A significant amount of laboratory-based research has been carried out on this topic, however, in 2013 the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) pointed out the lack of guidance for managing biofilms in clinical practice and solicited the need for guidelines and further clinical research. In response to this challenge, the Italian Nursing Wound Healing Society (AISLeC) initiated a project which aimed to achieve consensus among a multidisciplinary and multiprofessional international panel of experts to identify what could be considered part of 'good clinical practice' with respect to the recognition and management of biofilms in acute and chronic wounds. The group followed a systematic approach, developed by the GRADE working group, to define relevant questions and clinical recommendations raised in clinical practice. An independent librarian retrieved and screened approximately 2000 pertinent published papers to produce tables of levels of evidence. After a smaller focus group had a multistep structured discussion, and a formal voting process had been completed, ten therapeutic interventions were identified as being strongly recommendable for clinical practice, while another four recommendations were graded as being 'weak'. The panel subsequently formulated a preliminary statement (although with a weak grade of agreement): 'provided that other causes that prevent optimal wound healing have been ruled out, chronic wounds are chronically infected'. All members of the panel agreed that there is a paucity of reliable, well-conducted clinical trials which have produced clear evidence related to the effects of biofilm presence. In the meantime it was agreed that expert-based guidelines were needed to be developed for the recognition and management of biofilms in wounds and for the best design of future clinical trials. This is a fundamental and urgent task for both laboratory-based scientists and clinicians.

Profore is as effective as Unna's Boot in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

This study was sponsored by ConvaTec.

Introduction Compression therapy by inelastic bandages is highly effective in achieving venous leg ulcer healing. Inelastic bandages may be expensive as they need to be changed and discarded at every dressing change. In addition, correct application is difficult in the clinical practice, even by expert healthcare personnel. The aim of our work was to assess whether adjustable compression wraps are more cost effective and more effective than inelastic bandage to achieve venous leg ulcer healing. Methods Sixty-six venous leg ulcer patients were randomized to be treated by adjustable compression wrap (CircAid® JuxtaCure®) ( n = 33) and inelastic bandage (Coban 2 Layer®) ( n = 33). Study duration was 12 weeks. During weekly visits, the ulcers were cleansed and dressed with the same products, and the only variable was the compression device. Ulcer size, ulcer pain, patient’s perception of compression systems, and compression pressure were assessed during the visits, and the material cost was evaluated at the 12th week. Results Adjustable compression wraps were significantly cheaper than bandages (p < 0.0001) and were also more effective (not significantly) in achieving ulcer healing. To heal one ulcer patient, €228 had to be spent when applying an adjustable compression wrap and €381 if inelastic bandages were used. About 26/33 (78.8%) patients in the adjustable compression wrap group were healed after 12 weeks versus 23/33 (69.7%) in the inelastic bandage group (n.s.). Ulcer pain was reduced by both compression devices. Patient perception of compression pressure was similar with both compression devices. Compression pressure was similar at application but better maintained by adjustable compression wrap over time. Conclusions Adjustable compression wraps are significantly cheaper and more effective (not significantly) in achieving venous leg ulcer healing. Self-applicable, adjustable compression wraps are therefore a powerful, cost-effective alternative to inelastic bandages in treating venous leg ulcer.

SUMMARY Intracellular free calcium, [Ca 2 + ],, was studied in platelets of essential hypertensive subjects and normotensive controls under basal conditions and after stimulation with epinephrine, norepinephrine, angiotensin II, ouabain, and thrombin, using the fluorescent calcium indicator quin 2. Basal [Ca 2+ ], was significantly higher in hypertensive subjects (n = 32) than in normotensive controls (n = 30; 167.4 ± 5.0 vs 143.2 ± 3.1 nmol/L; p<0.001). Epinephrine, norepinephrine, angiotensin II, and ouabain had no effect on platelet calcium, whereas thrombin induced a dose-dependent increase in [Ca 2+ ]| in both the presence and absence of extracellular calcium. This [Ca 2+ ]| increase in the presence of extracellular calcium, which depends mainly on calcium influx, was significantly higher (p<0.05) in platelets of hypertensive subjects at all thrombin concentrations (ranging from 0.025-0.1 U/ml), while the [Ca 2+ ]| increase in the absence of extracellular calcium, which depends only on release from intracellular stores, was similar in hypertensive subjects and controls. These results suggest that, in essential hypertension, there is not only increased platelet resting [Ca 2+ ]| but also an increase in agonist-mediated calcium influx, which appears to indicate a cell membrane abnormality in the platelets of subjects with essential hypertension.