IntroductionAlthough many sepsis biomarkers have shown promise in selected patient groups, only C-reactive protein and procalcitonin (PCT) have entered clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate three promising novel sepsis biomarkers in unselected patients at admission to intensive care. We assessed the performance of pancreatic stone protein (PSP), soluble CD25 (sCD25) and heparin binding protein (HBP) in distinguishing patients with sepsis from those with a non-infective systemic inflammatory response and the ability of these markers to indicate severity of illness.MethodsPlasma levels of the biomarkers, PCT and selected inflammatory cytokines were measured in samples taken from 219 patients during the first six hours of admission to intensive or high dependency care. Patients with a systemic inflammatory response were categorized as having sepsis or a non-infective aetiology, with or without markers of severity, using standard diagnostic criteria.ResultsBoth PSP and sCD25 performed well as biomarkers of sepsis irrespective of severity of illness. For both markers the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was greater than 0.9; PSP 0.927 (0.887 to 0.968) and sCD25 0.902 (0.854 to 0.949). Procalcitonin and IL6 also performed well as markers of sepsis whilst in this intensive care unit (ICU) population, HBP did not: PCT 0.840 (0.778 to 0.901), IL6 0.805 (0.739 to 0.870) and HBP 0.607 (0.519 to 0.694). Levels of both PSP and PCT reflected severity of illness and both markers performed well in differentiating patients with severe sepsis from severely ill patients with a non-infective systemic inflammatory response: AUCs 0.955 (0.909 to 1) and 0.837 (0.732 to 0.941) respectively. Although levels of sCD25 did not correlate with severity, the addition of sCD25 to either PCT or PSP in a multivariate model improved the diagnostic accuracy of either marker alone.ConclusionsPSP and sCD25 perform well as sepsis biomarkers in patients with suspected sepsis at the time of admission to intensive or high dependency care. These markers warrant further assessment of their prognostic value. Whereas previously published data indicate HBP has clinical utility in the emergency department, it did not perform well in an intensive-care population.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is known to affect pharmacokinetics and hence optimum dosing. The aim of this open label, prospective study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir (prodrug) and oseltamivir carboxylate (active metabolite) during ECMO. Fourteen adult patients with suspected or confirmed H1N1 influenza were enrolled in the study. Oseltamivir 75 mg was enterally administered twice daily and blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were taken on day 1 and 5. A multi-compartmental model to describe the pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate was developed using a nonlinear mixed effects modelling approach. The median (range) clearance of oseltamivir carboxylate was 15.8 (4.8-36.6) l/hour, lower than the reported mean value of 21.5 l/hour in healthy adults. The median (range) steady state volume of distribution of oseltamivir carboxylate was 179 (61-436) litres, much greater than healthy adults but similar to previous reports in critically ill patients. Substantial 'between subject' variability in systemic exposure to oseltamivir carboxylate was revealed; median (range) area under the curve and C max were 4346 (644-13660) ng/hour/ml and 509 (54-1277) ng/ml, respectively. Both area under the curve and C max were significantly correlated with serum creatinine (r 2 =0.37, P=0.02 and r 2 =0.29, P=0.02, respectively). Systemic exposure to oseltamivir carboxylate following the administration of enteral oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily in adult ECMO patients is comparable to those in ambulatory patients and far in excess of concentrations required to maximally inhibit neuraminidase activity of the H1N1 virus. Dosage adjustment for ECMO, per se, appears not to be necessary; however, doses should be reduced in patients with renal dysfunction.

No abstract

No abstract

This prospective, longitudinal study is an extension of the seminal work by Herridge,1 which sheds light into the physical and psychological impairment, and the increased costs of healthcare services associated with critical illness following survival from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This benchmark paper stresses the need for family-centred, long-term rehabilitation after a prolonged critical illness. Level of evidence: 2C (Outcome/follow-up study)