The depletion of gas condensate reservoirs to pressures below the dew point has been studied by reservoir engineers for many years. Pressure decline below the dew point pressure causes condensation to occur which creates a hydrocarbon liquid saturation in the reservoir. This process reduces liquid recovery and may reduce gas productivity and gas recovery. Exxon experience, particularly in low-productivity, high-yield gas condensate fields, suggests that liquid condensate formation can result in severe loss of well deliverability and therefore of gas recovery. This study was undertaken to evaluate the historical frequency and severity of productivity impairment due to near-wellbore condensate buildup and to identify reservoir parameters associated with severe productivity and recovery reduction. This study of gas condensate reservoirs included a survey of Exxon and published industry experience, a review of published laboratory data, and simulations with single well flow models. Data from 17 fields are included in this paper to demonstrate that severe loss of gas recovery occurs primarily in low productivity reservoirs. Production data from two wells were history matched with simple radial models to evaluate the potential range of the critical condensate saturation (the minimum mobile condensate saturation) and its impact on gas recovery. Published laboratory data for gas-condensate relative permeability were used as a starting point for these simulations. The primary conclusion from this study is that productivity impairment results in reductions in gas recovery for wells with a permeability-thickness below 1000 md-ft. The history matched simulations support a range of critical condensate saturations from 10% to 30%, in good agreement with published laboratory values. Introduction The depletion of rich, gas condensate reservoirs to pressures significantly below the dew point is a topic of increasing interest as deeper, hotter hydrocarbon reservoirs are exploited. The cost and risk to develop reservoirs under these extreme conditions highlights the need to be able to confidently predict the recovery of gas and liquids from these reservoirs. In particular, there is a need to better understand the factors controlling the decline of well productivity due to hydrocarbon liquid saturation developing in the near-wellbore region of the reservoir as the flowing pressure declines below the dew point pressure. Reservoir engineers have been concerned about the impact of condensate blocking on productivity for many years. Several examples of severe productivity decline are available in the literature. At Exxon, several fields have been identified in which productivity loss below the dew point has significantly reduced gas recovery by pressure depletion. One example of poor performance is shown in figure 1. This is a moderately rich gas condensate field with an initial condensate-gas ratio of 73 bbl/Mscf. The well produced at initial rates over 1 Mscfd. When the flowing bottom-hole pressure reached the dew point, gas production declined rapidly and the well died. Pressure surveys indicated that the well was full of liquid hydrocarbons. Attempts to swab the well were unsuccessful, even though data from surrounding wells indicated the average reservoir pressure was still over 2000 psi above the dew point pressure. The well appears to have 'locked up' and ceased production shortly alter the flowing bottom-hole pressure passed below the dew point pressure. Eventually the well was successfully fracture stimulated, returning the well to initial production rates. P. 677
According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), oil production in the United States reached 6.68 million barrels a day in November, 2012, its highest level since 1994. Development of hydrocarbons in deep unconventional formations via horizontal drilling and fracturing has been the main contributor to this growth. The two most impactful plays have been Bakken in North Dakota and Eagle Ford in Texas. While recognizing the success of unconventionals associated with high oil price and enhanced hydraulic fracture stimulation technologies, it is important to understand the development challenges and factors controlling recovery.The combination of limited drainage area and low resource density in unconventional systems has led to low recovery per well and challenging economics. Unconventional development has increasingly focused on liquids rich systems, especially in North America due to relatively low natural gas prices. The addition of liquids can improve overall economics, athough two phase flow impacts and complicates fluid flow and ultimate recovery. Performance of liquids rich systems is highly dependent on in-place fluid composition and phase behavior. Therefore, understanding liquids rich system phase behavior and its impact on performance is an important economic consideration. This paper discusses the drive mechanisms for unconventional plays ranging from dry gas to oil and the importance of geology and rock and fluid properties on rate and recovery. It specifically explores how the variation in liquid yield impacts rate and recovery.
This paper describes a new analysis technique for determining vert i ca 1 permeability from pressure buildup data in partially-perforated wells. 'The method applies when the vertical permeability is low enough that the Horner straight-1 ine region .characteristic of the perforated interval exists. A correlation chart is presented that relates the vertical permeability to the dimensionless pressure group (p*-P;)/m, the percent completion, and a dimensionless time based on the flow duration, rock and fluid properties, and the thickness of the perforated interval. The variable m is the slope of the straight line corresponding to the perforated interval, p* is the extrapolation of this line to infinite shut-in time, and P; is the initial reservoir pressure. Two simulated pressure bui 1 dup responses are presented and discussed to illustrate the technique.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.