India is the largest agrarian subcontinent supporting 26% world’s agricultural population on 12% arable land. India is also the fifth largest vegetable oil economy accounting 7.4% oilseeds, 5.8% oils and 6.1% oil meal production, and 9.3% of edible oil consumption in the world. Oilseeds are the second most important agricultural economy in India next to cereals growing at a pace of 4.1% per annum in the last three decades. Oilseed brassica shares 23.5% area and 24.2% production of total oilseeds in the country. Despite being the third largest producer (11.3%) of oilseed brassica after Canada and China in the world, India meets 57% of the domestic edible oil requirements through imports and ranked 7th largest importer of edible oils in the world. Oilseed brassica achieved significant growth in India in the past, however, the productivity levels are still low owing to large cultivation under rainfed situation, biotic and abiotic stresses, and resources crunch. It is also facing the challenges of low genotypic potential, climate change and price fluctuation. Though, it embraces the immense scope to increase the production in traditional and non-traditional areas in India with proper inputs, technological interventions, and suitable policy framework. This needs to develop strategies in a well-planned, targeted manner with multi-scientific inputs, policy interface and stable price systems to bring the desired growth in oilseeds brassica production, and to reduce the import of edible oils in the country.

No abstract

No abstract

Core Ideas Peanut–wheat–Sesbania cropping system recorded the highest peanut–pod equivalent yield.Peanut–wheat–Sesbania/ green gram markedly increased soil enzymatic activities.Bulk density decreased in peanut‐CTW and peanut + pigeonpea crop rotations. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a soil‐C depleting crop under a continuous monocropping system. A study was conducted comprising combinations of tillage practices (zero tillage [ZT] or conventional tillage [CT]), crop rotation (sole peanut, peanut‐wheat [Triticum aestivum L.], or peanut+pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan L.]), and green manuring (GM) (green gram [Vigna radiata L.], sesbania [Sesbania aculeata Willd.], or wheat straw incorporation [WSI]). Peanut pod yield was found higher in peanut followed by wheat either zero tilled (ZTW) or conventional tilled (CTW), and GM either with sesbania/green gram/WSI. Green manuring in peanut–ZTW and peanut+pigeonpea recorded higher grain yield of wheat (3.11 t ha−1) and pigeonpea (1.76 t ha−1), respectively. Sesbania GM increased root biomass of peanut, wheat, and pigeonpea in all the systems. Peanut‐pod equivalent yield recorded significantly higher in peanut–ZTW or CTW when included GM with either sesbania or green gram (3.64 t ha−1). Found higher accumulation of soil N in peanut–ZTW–sesbania (33.8 kg ha−1), P in peanut–CTW (6.4 kg ha−1), and S in peanut–CTW (3.7 kg ha−1) crop rotations. Activities of urease, β‐glucosidase, acid phosphatase, and alkaline phosphatase were increased in all the crop rotations that included green manuring or WSI over sole peanut. Soil bulk density (0–15 cm depth) was recorded lower in peanut–CTW, however, higher in peanut–ZTW. Peanut followed by ZTW or CTW and green manuring either with sesbania or green gram found more sustainable than sole peanut in terms of peanut‐pod equivalent yield and improved soil enzyme activities.

No abstract