No abstract

Twenty-seven patients with successful transplantation and a control group of 14 patients with early rejection of the pancreas graft but functioning kidney graft were examined in a prospective study for 3 yr. Before transplantation, all patients had long-standing type I diabetes with advanced secondary complications, including end-stage diabetic nephropathy. After transplantation in the patients of both groups, kidney function was almost normal. Mean HbA1 levels were normal in the group with pancreas graft survival. In the control group, HbA1 levels were, on average, 1.5% higher compared with the group with pancreas survival (P = 0.00005). After 3 yr, the patients with functioning pancreas graft showed fewer symptoms (mean difference 1.0 in a symptom score ranging from 0 to 16, P = 0.004) compared with the control group. No statistically significant difference between both groups concerning clinical signs of polyneuropathy could be observed. In the pancreas and kidney transplantation group, peroneal and median nerve conduction velocities increased 7.2 m/s (P < 0.01) and 3.5 m/s (P < 0.05), respectively, whereas no increase was registered in the control group. The change of median and sural sensory nerve conduction velocities, peroneal and median compound muscle action potentials, and sural and median sensory action potentials was insignificant. In conclusion, although the improvement of clinical symptoms and neurophysiological signs of polyneuropathy was modest in the pancreas and kidney transplantation group, our data suggest that successful pancreas transplantation is able not only to halt the progression of diabetic polyneuropathy but also to improve it to some extent even at a far advanced stage.

Thirty-nine Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients were studied prospectively after simultaneous pancreas and kidney (n=26) and kidney grafting alone (n=13) by measuring heart rate variation during various manoeuvers and answering a standardized questionnaire every 6 to 12 months post-transplant. While age, duration of diabetes, and serum creatinine (168.1+35.4 vs 132.7+17.7 btmol/1) were comparable, haemoglobin A 1 levels were significantly lower (6.6+0.2 vs 8.5+0.3%; p<0.01) and the mean observation time longer (35+2 vs 25+3 months; p<0.05) in the pancreas recipients when compared with kidney transplanted patients. Heart rate variation during deep breathing, lying/standing and Valsalva manoeuver were very similar in both groups initially and did not improve during follow-up. However, there was a significant reduction in heart rate in the pancreas recipient group. Autonomic symptoms of the gastrointestinal and thermoregulatory system improved more in the pancreas grafted subjects, while hypoglycaemia unawareness deteriorated in the kidney recipients. This study suggests that long-term normoglycaemia by successful pancreatic grafting is able to halt the progression of autonomic dysfunction.

Fifty-eight patients with long-standing type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes were studied prospectively after combined pancreas and kidney transplantation for a mean observation period of 47.9 months (range 17-116 months). Thirty-three per cent of these patients (19/58) developed carpal tunnel syndrome after a mean interval of 1.7 years (range 3 months-5 years). This rate is about twice that in type 1 diabetic patients. The manifestation of carpal tunnel syndrome was not significantly associated with worsening of diabetic polyneuropathy or with deterioration of kidney or pancreas function. In all but one patient symptoms improved without surgical intervention. This study suggests that patients after combined pancreas and kidney transplantation have an increased risk of carpal tunnel syndrome for which the etiology and pathophysiology are unknown. In most patients no surgical intervention is necessary.

No abstract