The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptors ALK2 and ALK3 are essential for expression of hepcidin, a key iron regulatory hormone. In mice, hepatocyte-specific Alk2 deficiency leads to moderate iron overload with periportal liver iron accumulation, while hepatocyte-specific Alk3 deficiency leads to severe iron overload with centrilobular liver iron accumulation and a more marked reduction of basal hepcidin levels. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the two receptors have additive roles in hepcidin regulation. Iron overload in mice with hepatocyte-specific Alk2 and Alk3 (Alk2/3) deficiency was characterized and compared to hepatocyte-specific Alk3 deficient mice. Co-immunoprecipitation studies were performed to detect the formation of ALK2 and ALK3 homodimer and heterodimer complexes in vitro in the presence and absence of ligands. The iron overload phenotype of hepatocyte-specific Alk2/3-deficient mice was more severe than that of hepatocyte-specific Alk3-deficient mice. In vitro co-immunoprecipitation studies in Huh7 cells showed that ALK3 can homodimerize in absence of BMP2 or BMP6. In contrast, ALK2 did not homodimerize in either the presence or absence of BMP ligands. However, ALK2 did form heterodimers with ALK3 in the presence of BMP2 or BMP6. ALK3-ALK3 and ALK2-ALK3 receptor complexes induced hepcidin expression in Huh7 cells. Our data indicate that: (I) ALK2 and ALK3 have additive functions in vivo, as Alk2/3 deficiency leads to a greater degree of iron overload than Alk3 deficiency; (II) ALK3, but not ALK2, undergoes ligand-independent homodimerization; (III) the formation of ALK2-ALK3 heterodimers is ligand-dependent and (IV) both receptor complexes functionally induce hepcidin expression in vitro.

Recently, there has been increased concern about a risk of secondary malignancies (SM) occurring in myelofibrosis (MF) patients receiving ruxolitinib (RUX). In polycythemia vera (PV), on the other hand, only limited data on the risk of SM under RUX treatment are available. To investigate the association between RUX therapy in PV and SM, we conducted a retrospective, single-center study that included 289 PV patients. RUX was administered to 32.9% (95/289) of patients for a median treatment duration of 48.0 months (range 1.0–101.6). Within a median follow-up of 97 months (1.0–395.0) after PV diagnosis, 24 SM occurred. Comparing the number of PV patients with RUX-associated SM (n = 10, 41.7%) with the 14 (58.3%) patients who developed SM without RUX, no significant difference (p = 0.34, chi square test) was found. No increased incidences of melanoma, lymphoma, or solid “non-skin” malignancies were observed with RUX (p = 0.31, p = 0.60, and p = 0.63, respectively, chi square test). However, significantly more NMSC occurred in association with RUX treatment (p = 0.03, chi-squared test). The “SM-free survival” was not significantly different by log rank test for all 289 patients (p = 0.65), for the patients (n = 208; 72%) receiving cytoreductive therapy (p = 0.48) or for different therapy sequences (p = 0.074). In multivariate analysis, advanced age at PV diagnosis (HR 1.062 [95% CI 1.028, 1.098]) but not administration of RUX (HR 1.068 [95% CI 0.468, 2.463]) was associated with an increased risk for SM (p = 0.005). According to this retrospective analysis, no increased risk of SM due to RUX treatment could be substantiated for PV.

No abstract