The prevention of hip fractures is a desirable goal to reduce morbidity, mortality, and socio-economic burden. We evaluated the influence on femoral strength of different clinically applicable cementing techniques as ''femoroplasty.'' Twenty-eight human cadaveric femora were augmented by means of four clinically applicable percutaneous cementing techniques and then tested biomechanically against their native contralateral control to determine fracture strength in an established biomechanical model mimicking a fall on the greater trochanter. The energy applied until fracture could be significantly increased by two of the methods by 160% (53.1 Nm vs. 20.4 Nm, p < 0.001) and 164% (47.1 Nm vs. 17.8 Nm, p ¼ 0.008), respectively. The peak load to failure was significantly increased by three of the methods by 23% (3818.3 N vs. 3095.7 N, p ¼ 0.003), 35% (3698.4 N vs. 2737.5 N, p ¼ 0.007), and 12% (3056.8 N vs. 2742.8 N, p ¼ 0.005), respectively. The femora augmented with cemented double drill holes had a lower fracture strength than the single drilled ones. Experimental femoroplasty is a technically feasible procedure for the prophylactic reinforcement of the osteoporotic proximal femur and, hence, could be an auxiliary treatment option to protect the proximal femur against osteoporotic fractures. ß
NE affects chondrocytes from OA cartilage regarding inflammatory response and its cell metabolism in a dose dependent manner. The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) may have a dual function in OA pathology with preserving a stable chondrocyte phenotype via β-AR signaling and OA pathogenesis accelerating effects via α-AR signaling.
BackgroundImpingement can be a serious complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and is one of the major causes of postoperative pain, dislocation, aseptic loosening, and implant breakage. Minimally invasive THA and computer-navigated surgery were introduced several years ago. We have developed a novel, computer-assisted operation method for THA following the concept of "femur first"/"combined anteversion", which incorporates various aspects of performing a functional optimization of the cup position, and comprehensively addresses range of motion (ROM) as well as cup containment and alignment parameters. Hence, the purpose of this study is to assess whether the artificial joint's ROM can be improved by this computer-assisted operation method. Second, the clinical and radiological outcome will be evaluated.Methods/DesignA registered patient- and observer-blinded randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Patients between the ages of 50 and 75 admitted for primary unilateral THA will be included. Patients will be randomly allocated to either receive minimally invasive computer-navigated "femur first" THA or the conventional minimally invasive THA procedure. Self-reported functional status and health-related quality of life (questionnaires) will be assessed both preoperatively and postoperatively. Perioperative complications will be registered. Radiographic evaluation will take place up to 6 weeks postoperatively with a computed tomography (CT) scan. Component position will be evaluated by an independent external institute on a 3D reconstruction of the femur/pelvis using image-processing software. Postoperative ROM will be calculated by an algorithm which automatically determines bony and prosthetic impingements.DiscussionIn the past, computer navigation has improved the accuracy of component positioning. So far, there are only few objective data quantifying the risks and benefits of computer navigated THA. Therefore, this study has been designed to compare minimally invasive computer-navigated "femur first" THA with a conventional technique for minimally invasive THA. The results of this trial will be presented as soon as they become available.Trial registration numberDRKS00000739
Intraoperative fluoroscopy and imageless navigation seem equivalent in accuracy and precision to reconstruct leg length and global and femoral offset during MIS THA with the patient in the lateral decubitus position.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.