Advances in reproduction technologies, such as in vitro maturation, IVF, and in vitro culture, stimulated research for efficient cryopreservation techniques for mammalian oocytes. It is well known that the oocyte is the largest cell of an animal's body and as such, is full of water and, in many species, fat, making it difficult to cryopreserve. The objective of this work was to study the effect of vitrification for cryopreservation of the metaphase II plate (MPII) of sheep oocytes. Ovaries from 20 ewes of Kazakh Arkharo-Merino breed were acquired after slaughter and maintained at 37°C in TCM-199. The maturation medium was TCM-199, containing 1 mM of glutamine, 10% FBS, 5 μg mL–1 FSH, 5 μg mL–1 LH, 1 μg mL–1 oestradiol, 0.3 mM sodium pyruvate, and 100 mM cysteamine. The oocytes were incubated in 400 μL of medium in 4-well dishes covered with mineral oil. The IVM conditions were 5% CO2 in humidified air at 39°C for 24 h. Then they were placed for 10 min in a media with Hoechst 33342 (3 μg mL–1) and cytochalasin B (7 μg mL–1) to facilitate the enucleation of the MPII with a minimum volume of ooplasm. The MPII plates were divided into 2 groups: the vitrification group was exposed to vitrification media containing 1.12 M ethylene glycol (ET) + 0.87 M ME2SO for 5 min and was exposed in vitrification media containing 2.24 M ET + 1.75 M ME2SO for 5 min, and then in vitrification solution containing 4.48 M ET + 40% ME2SO + 0.25 M sucrose for 30 s. Oocytes were loaded into cryoloop and plunged into liquid nitrogen (LN2). Oocytes were thawed in a 25°C water bath and then placed in TCM-199 at 20% fetal bovine serum. After 15 min of incubation the oocytes were activated for extrusion of the second polar body in 1 mg mL–1 Ca ionophore for 5 min and washed for 5 min followed by 4 h in 6-DMAP (0.12 mM) + cycloheximide (0.6 μg mL–1). After activation the MPII were washed and cultured for 20 h. The control group received the same treatment, but they were not vitrified. Differences between the experimental groups were tested using Chi-squared test. Our research showed the expulsion of the second polar body after activation was observed in more than 62.2% of the MPII that were not vitrified (control group), whereas 40.5% of vitrified plates had expulsion of polar bodies (P < 0.05). These preliminary studies showed that it is possible to vitrify MPII plates. On the other hand, the drastic reduction of the volume of the sheep oocytes might make cryopreservation possible with greater efficiency.
Both tissue and cell cryopreservation can be applied for biodiversity conservation. The proper preservation of tissues and cells from a wide range of animals of different species is of paramount importance, because these cell samples could be used to reintroduce lost genes back into the breeding pool by somatic cell cloning. The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of different cooling rates on viability of frozen–thawed sheep fibroblasts for conservation of biodiversity so that it might be used in the future to provide nuclear donors (Table 1). Skin samples collected from 10 adult sheep were cut on small pieces (1 × 1 mm), placed into culture Petri dishes containing DMEM supplemented with 20% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), and covered with coverslips followed by incubation at 5% CO2, 95% relative humidity, and 37°C. During culture, fibroblasts left skin samples and proliferated. Culture medium was changed every 4 days. After 21 to 22 days of incubation, a fibroblast monolayer was observed, culture medium was removed, and cells were incubated for 7 to 10 min in presence of Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline + 0.25% trypsin. Dissociated fibroblasts were washed with DMEM by centrifugation at 300g for 10 min. For cryoconservation, fibroblast samples were then diluted at a concentration of 2 × 106 cells mL–1 in DMEM + 20% FBS and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide or 10% ethylene glycol and placed into 0.25-mL plastic straws or 2-mL cryovials. Straws were sealed with modeling clay and maintained at +5°C for 120 min before freezing. Cryopreservation of fibroblasts was carried out by 2 procedures: (1) straws were frozen in programmable freezer Kryo Planer 360-3,5 using the following freezing regimen: +5°C to –40°C at –1°C min–1, –40°C to –85°C at –4°C min–1, and then plunged into liquid nitrogen; (2) cryovials were placed in a Styrofoam box and loaded into a freezer at –70°C for 24 h, and then samples were plunged into liquid nitrogen for storage. Samples were thawed for 1 min in a 37°C water bath. Frozen–thawed samples were diluted with DMEM (1 : 5) and centrifuged at 300g for 7 to 10 min. Supernatants were removed, and cells were diluted with DMEM at a concentration of 2 × 106 cells mL–1. Viability of frozen–thawed fibroblast samples was detected using the Trypan Blue staining method. The values obtained (Table 1) are expressed as mean standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was done using Student’s test. Results indicated that there was a significant difference in viability between fresh and cryopreserved fibroblasts. However, there were no differences between the cooling procedures. Importantly, our data suggest that the use of 1.5-M ethylene glycol reduced the toxic elements contained in the cryopreservation solution while maintaining a similar ability to produce viable fibroblasts after cryoconservation. Table 1.Effect of 2 cryoprotectant agent (CPA) on the viability of frozen–thawed ovine fibroblasts
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.