Mathematical expressions have been constructed that allow the large-scale global convection characteristics of the high-latitude ionosphere to be reproduced. The model contains no discontinuities in the ion convection velocity and as such should be useful in F region chemical models. The number of variables in the model allow such features as the dayside throat and the Harang discontinuity to be modeled. The applicability of the model to magnetospheric physics is limited by the exclusion of largemagnitude small-scale flow features associated with discrete arcs and by the inability of the model to produce separate flow cells at the same local time.

Abstract. A comprehensive ring current model (CRCM) has been developed that couples the Rice Convection Model (RCM) and the kinetic model of Fok and coworkers. The coupled model is able to simulate, for the first time using a self-consistently calculated electric field, the evolution of an inner magnetosphere plasma distribution that conserves the first two adiabatic invariants. The traditional RCM calculates the ionospheric electric fields and currents consistent with a magnetospheric ion distribution that is assumed to be isotropic in pitch angle. The Fok model calculates the plasma distribution by solving the Boltzmann equation with specified electric and magnetic fields. To combine the RCM and the Fok model, the RCM Birkeland current algorithm has been generalized to arbitrary pitch angle distributions. Given a specification of height-integrated ionospheric conductance, the RCM component of the CRCM computes the ionospheric electric field and currents. The Fok model then advances the ring current plasma distribution using the electric field computed by the RCM and at the same time calculates losses along particle drift paths. We present the logic of CRCM and the first validation results following the H + distribution during the previously studied magnetic storm of May 2, 1986. The H + fluxes calculated by the coupled model agree very well with observations by AMPTE/CCE. In particular, the coupled model is able to reproduce the high H + flux seen on the dayside at L -2.3 that the previous simulation, which employed a Stern-Volland convection model with shielding factor 2, failed to produce. Though the Stern-Volland and CRCM electric fields differ in several respects, the most notable difference is that the CRCM predicts strong electric fields near Earth in the storm main phase, particularly in the dusk-midnight quadrant. Thus the CRCM injects particles more deeply and more quickly.

No abstract

Large subauroral convection velocities are striking features of the vector ion drift measurements made with the RPA's and drift meters on the Atmosphere Explorer satellites. The large AE‐C data base has been utilized to investigate the character and morphology of this phenomenon. These latitudinally narrow features are found to be confined predominantly to the local time sector between 18:00 hrs and 02:00 hrs. They occur either singly or as multiple events, one of which nearly always straddles the equatorward edge of the auroral zone. Their occurrence probability as a function of AE index suggests a dependence on magnetic substorm activity.

We have computed the convection potential drop across the polar cap from data obtained on high‐inclination low‐altitude satellites (AE‐C, AE‐D, S3‐3) and correlated these potential measurements with various combinations of parameters measured simultaneously in the upstream solar wind. These combinations of solar wind parameters consist of predictions based on magnetic merging theory and suggestions based on earlier empirical work. We find that the bulk of the potential drop, and its variation with interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) parameters, are successfully predicted by merging theory (to the accuracy with which they can presently be measured), but that a significant ‘background’ potential drop (∼35 kV) does not depend on IMF parameters and may thus be attributed to an unknown process other than merging. Our results indicate that small values of the IMF are amplified by a factor of 5–10 at the dayside magnetopause as a combined effect of bow shock compression and the Zwan‐Wolf depletion layer effect; correlations between IMF parameters and the polar cap potential drop are dramatically improved when this amplification is taken into account. The potential drop is better correlated with IMF parameters than with geomagnetic activity indices, presumably because the latter are affected by nonlinear reponses of the magnetosphere to the polar cap input.