Previous work has demonstrated that knock in the spark-ignition engine is a phenomenon confined to the last part of the charge to burn, and that it is the chemical reactions in this ‘ end-gas ’ which determine whether or not knock will occur. The purpose of this paper is to try to elucidate the nature of these reactions and to discover some of the critical chemical factors controlling the occur- rence of knock. This has been done in three main ways: ( a ) the sequence of chemical reactions occurring in the ‘end-gas’ prior to knock has been followed by means of a specially designed electromagnetic gas-sampling valve which can abstract samples of this gas at various stages in the combustion cycle, ( b ) the effect of the addition of various substances to the cylinder charge on the knock-limited compression ratio of the engine has been determined and ( c ) a study has been made in a motored engine of the limits of cool and hot flame formation. Ricardo E. 6 variable-compression engines were used for all these investigations. Preliminary tests with small quantities of additives, such as azomethane, alkyl nitrites and nitrates, carbon tetrachloride and chloropicrin, demonstrated that substances which would be expected to give rise to free radicals in the engine cylinder are strong pro-knocks. This and the anti-knock action of minute quantities of additives such as lead tetraethyl show the chain nature of the reactions leading to knock. Experiments are described to demonstrate that these reactions are substantially independent of the nature of the cylinder walls. Qualitative sampling tests indicated that knock depends not so much on the formation of some new substance which was not present under non-knocking conditions but rather on the attainment of a critical rate of formation of products present under both conditions. Further experiments with additives in which various intermediate products of reaction, such as aldehydes, nitrogen peroxide and organic peroxides, were tested, showed that with normal fuels the organic peroxides were the only products which were strongly pro-knock and formaldehyde the only product which had an anti-knock effect. This led to the subsequent sampling investigation being concentrated largely on the estimation of these two products in the ‘end-gases’. A method for analyzing for organic peroxides in small concentration and in the presence of other reaction products, such as nitrogen peroxide, was developed. Use of this method with a higher paraffinic fuel showed that peroxide formation was two-stage in nature. The first stage culminated in the formation of a point of inflexion or small peak in the curve of peroxide concentration about 1 ° after top dead centre. In the second stage the curve normally rose again to a higher peak at about 7° 1. Lead tetraethyl had a much greater depressing effect on the peak at 7° L compared with that at 1° 1. The mixture strength giving maximum knock was the same as that giving maximum peroxide concentration. Analyses were also made for aldehydes, shown to be mainly formaldehyde. The main growth of the formaldehyde formation took place in the second of the two stages of peroxide formation. A much smaller quantity of peroxide appeared to be formed when methane was the fuel, and this was eliminated when lead tetraethyl was added to suppress the knock. Benzene formed no peroxides, and none was detected with the alkyl benzenes up to cumene. This difference between benzene and methane on the one hand and the higher paraffinic fuels on the other in regard to peroxide formation was paralleled by the different effect of additives on the two classes of fuel. Formaldehyde was an anti-knock in the latter class and a pro-knock in the former class; acetaldehyde and benzaldehyde were ineffective in the latter but strongly pro-knock in the former; nitrogen peroxide has only a slight pro-knock effect in the latter but was strongly pro knock in the former. Experiments with the higher paraffinic fuels on a motored engine showed that if conditions of temperature and pressure were such as to simulate those obtaining in the ‘end-gas’ prior to knock, cool flames were formed at a time in the cycle approximately corresponding to the point of inflexion of the peroxide sampling curves. No cool flames were detected with benzene or methane. Bright blue flames were observed near the ignition point over certain ranges of mixture strength with benzene and methane as well as with the higher paraffins. Non-engine work has shown the existence of two main types of combustion, namely, so-called ‘low’- and ‘ high ’-temperature types. Of these the first is associated with peroxide and cool-flame formation, ignition taking place by a two-stage process, whereas ignition of the second type is a single-stage process and not usually associated with cool flames or peroxide formation. From the evidence of (1) the peroxide analyses, (2) the experiments with additives and (3) the experiments with a motored engine, it is clear that normal fuels knock by the ‘low’-temperature process but that benzene and methane knock by the ‘ high’-temperature process. Experiments in which formaldehyde was used as a fuel and the effect of various additives on its knock limit determined, showed that its oxidation is best classified as of the ‘ high ’-temperature type and yielded further understanding of the nature of the reactions leading to knock. The effect of hydrogen as an additive with other fuels and the effect of various additives on its own highest useful compression ratio was determined. No peroxides were detected in engine samples when hydrogen was used as the fuel.
Although the importance of “knock” in limiting the power output and efficiency of the spark-ignition engine was realized long ago, and much empirical information has been accumulated which has enabled engine design and fuel quality to be improved—so minimizing the restrictions due to knock—progress in understanding the fundamental nature of the knocking process has been comparatively slow. Recent work, both in Great Britain and America, has improved our knowledge of the chemical and physical factors involved, resulting in a better understanding of the phenomenon. The use of an electromagnetically operated gas sampling valve has enabled the sequence of chemical reactions, occurring in the engine cylinder, prior to knock, to be followed. Organic peroxides have been shown to be some of the most important intermediate products of combustion, and the effect of changing engine conditions—such as compression ratio, speed, and mixture strength—on their formation has been explored. These experiments have shown that there are at least two types of precombustion knock mechanism, one a “low”-temperature two-stage process involving the formation of peroxides, and the other, a “high”-temperature process which is non-peroxidic in character. Studies of the combustion reactions in a motored engine have confirmed these conclusions. So far as the knocking process itself is concerned, there have been two main schools of thought, one that it was an autoignition (i.e., spontaneous ignition) pure and simple and the other that it was a detonation wave perhaps preceded by autoignition. In reviewing published work, the authors consider that the bulk of the evidence favours the autoignition theory. An alternative explanation of the N.A.C.A. high-speed photographic work is put forward which would appear to support the conception of a two-stage autoignition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.