Purpose People living with and beyond cancer often experience nutrition-related issues and should receive appropriate advice on nutrition that is consistent and evidence based. The aim of this study was to investigate current practice for the provision of nutritional care by healthcare professionals (HCPs) from a UK national survey produced by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cancer and Nutrition Collaboration. Methods An online survey sent to professional groups and networks included questions on discussing nutrition, providing information, awareness of guidelines, confidence in providing nutritional advice, training and strategies for improving nutritional management. Results There were 610 HCPs who responded including nurses (31%), dietitians (25%), doctors (31%) and speech and language therapists (9%). The majority of HCPs discusses nutrition (94%) and provides information on nutrition (77%). However, only 39% of HCPs reported being aware of nutritional guidelines, and just 20% were completely confident in providing nutritional advice. Awareness of guidelines varied between the different professional groups with most but not all dietitians reporting the greatest awareness of guidelines and GPs the least (p = 0.001). Those HCPs with a greater awareness of guidelines had received training (p = 0.001) and were more likely to report complete confidence in providing nutritional advice (p = 0.001). Conclusion Whilst HCPs discuss nutrition with cancer patients and may provide information, many lack an awareness of guidelines and confidence in providing nutritional advice. To ensure consistency of practice and improvements in patient care, there is scope for enhancing the provision of appropriate nutrition education and training.

Purpose Cancer cachexia (CC) is a syndrome characterised by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass associated with reduced tolerance to treatment. This study explored the prevalence and severity of CC in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and determined its relationship with chemotherapy outcomes. Methods CC was classified into a four-stage model: no cachexia, pre-cachexia (PC), cachexia and refractory cachexia (RC) with categorisation determined from biochemical and body composition and performance assessment. Associations between the stage of cachexia and chemotherapy outcomes including radiological response, the number of chemotherapy cycles completed and the number of cycles delayed or dose reduced were explored. Results Twenty-four patients were included with 4 (18%) classified as having no cachexia, 4 (18%) PC, 3 (14%) cachexia (13.6%), and 11 (50%) RC. No association was observed between the stage of cachexia and the radiological response to chemotherapy number of cycles delayed or the number of cycle's dose reduced; however, there was an association with the number of cycles completed (p = 0.030). An association between C-reactive protein (CRP) and the number of chemotherapy cycles completed (p = 0.044) and the number of dose reductions (p = 0.044) was also identified. Conclusions Limited conclusions can be drawn given the small sample size. However, the majority of patients presented with some degree of cachexia at diagnosis. A relationship was identified between the increasing severity of cachexia and a lower number of chemotherapy cycles completed, as well as between CRP and the number of chemotherapy cycles completed and the number of dose reductions required, and therefore warrants further exploration in larger studies.

therefore lowering toxicity and potentially opening the door to reassessment of RT dose intensification. Finally, with the explosion of evidence-based applications of immunotherapy in metastatic lung cancer and the demonstration of an impressive survival prolongation in the Phase III randomized PACIFIC trial with the addition of maintenance durvalumab following chemo-RT, the role of chemotherapy may be eventually challenged and reevaluated in Stage III NSCLC, to be possibly replaced by concurrent immunotherapy or a chemo-immunotherapy combination.

patients was re-audited 6 months after the introduction of the late evening snack round to evaluate its impact. Carbohydrate content of food and drink were analysed using manufacturer's labels or a carbohydrate database [5]. The audit included 26 participant contacts pre and post-snack round. After introducing a late evening snack round the number of participants consuming 50g of carbohydrate increased, however, 50% still did not achieve this target. The mean total carbohydrate intake more than doubled and the number of participants consuming carbohydrate increased from 50 to 96%. The number of participants taking oral nutritional supplements increased, which contributed to total carbohydrate intake but did not significantly alter the number of participant consuming carbohydrate.