Rapid brain enlargement requires a hydraulic mechanism in the chick embryo. Such a mechanism involves a closed, fluid-filled system that generates positive pressure. For the chick embryo this study determined when rapid brain enlargement begins, assessed the relative contributions of cavity expansion and tissue growth to overall brain enlargement, and evaluated mathematical models of overall brain enlargement and expansion and growth of the component parts. Three to five embryos were collected at each Hamburger and Hamilton state (11, 12, 14, 16, and 18) and processed for paraffin serial sectioning. Brain growth was determined over a 24-hr period (stages 11-18) by calculating volumes from area measurements of sections of brains from individual embryos by using a computerized image-analysis system. Statistical analysis indicated that a linear model adequately described cavity expansion, and a linear model was rejected for the description of tissue growth and total brain enlargement. At the onset of brain enlargement, the cavity expands faster than the tissue grows; but after 12 hr the reverse is true. Initially (i.e., at stage 11), the cavity accounts for 60% of the total brain volume and tissue for 40%. At stages 12-16, cavity and tissue contribute 50% each. Finally at stage 18, cavity accounts for 55% and tissue for 45%. In order to better distinguish changes in cavity expansion and tissue growth over the 24-hr period studied, this period was divided into four intervals (I-IV). The rates of both cavity expansion and tissue growth increase between intervals I and II, decrease between intervals II and III, and increase between intervals III and IV.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
SUMMARYThe genetic load associated with the method of sex determination in honey bees has been a great deterrent to selective breeding programmes, primarily because of a lack of understanding of the population genetics of the system. In this paper we examine the distribution of diploid brood viabilities in closed, random mating populations, as a function both of the system of sex determination and of multiple mating in queens. Analytically we show that for a given number of sex alleles, an increase in the numbers of matings of queens, reduces the variance in brood viability, but does not affect the mean. The results of a computer simulation demonstrate that the equilibrium number of sex alleles is approached very slowly from above, so that small populations that start with large numbers of sex alleles will maintain high brood viability for a long time. The practical significance of this is discussed.
Previous workers (McKenzie and Parsons, 1972, 1974; McKenzie, 1974; Briscoe et al., 1975) have found anomalous distributions of species of Drosophila, of sexes of D. melanogaster, and of Adh alleles in and around wineries in Australia and Spain. Field studies in California's Sonoma Valley provide evidence that the explanations advanced for these distributions may incorrect. The anomalous distribution of species was attributed to alcohol, either as a selective agent or as a behavioral stimulus. We find a virtually identical species distribution in the absence of environmental alcohol. The anomalous sex ratio was attributedd to differential survivall of the sexes when raised on alcohol. We present crude evidence thatehe difference may simply be a behavioral response to some product of fermentation, which need not be alcohol. Finally, the allele frequency difference reported from Spain was attributed to differential adult mortality on alcohol. We do not find an allele frequency difference even when alcohol is exposed, and therefore suggest that selection is occurring in pre-adult stages.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.