Fifty three subjects (31 normal volunteers and 22 patients with asthma) between the ages of 20 and 87 years had their theophylline clearance measured. Volume of distribution (V) and terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) were also calculated in the volunteers who received i.v. theophylline. Although patients tended to have higher clearance values than volunteers, in both groups the oldest third had the lowest clearances. For the combined group (corrected for the patient effect) the oldest third (mean age 70 years) had a mean clearance of 0.53 versus 0.72 for the middle third (mean age 47 years) and 0.73 ml/min/kg CBW for the youngest third (mean age 26 years). There was no statistically significant age related change in V/kg CBW but t1/2 did rise with increasing age. Thus, although clearance does not fall with increasing age during younger adult life, there is a fall during late adult life becoming apparent in the seventh, eighth and ninth decades.
1. Eight volunteers were given seven doses of 200 mg of slow release theophylline at either 11.00 h and 23.00 h (regimen 1) or 17.00 h and 05.00 h (regimen 2). At the time of the sixth dose (60 h) hourly blood sampling was started and continued for 24 h. After at least 1 week volunteers crossed over to the other regimen. 2. Volunteers retired to bed at 23.00 h and arose after the 07.00 h sample during both regimens. 3. During regimen 1 there was a marked rise in mean tmax from 3.3 h after dosing at 11.00 h to 9.3 h after dosing at 23.00 h (P less than 0.001). There was also a fall in AUC(0,12) from 89.9 mg l‐1 h after dosing at 11.00 h to 79.0 mg l‐1 h after dosing at 23.00 h. There was no difference in mean Cmax values. 4. During regimen 2 these circadian changes were abolished with mean values after both dosing times lying between those observed during regimen 1. 5. A marked delay in absorption occurs at night and cannot be explained by food intake.
The oral bioavailability of methotrexate is variable and may be dose-dependent. The absorption of 'interval' oral methotrexate, which is given between cycles of chemotherapy, is unknown. The bioavailability of oral methotrexate has been studied in eight patients, acting as their own controls, to assess the effect of subdivision of the dose, the formulation, and the timing of the methotrexate within the chemotherapy cycle. The mean bioavailability for all the oral methods of administration was 28.2% +/- 3.7% compared with the same dose given IV. Absorption was uninfluenced by subdivision of the dose, liquid or tablet formulation, or administration on day 1 or day 10 of the chemotherapy cycle.
Summary:The degree of binding of a drug to plasma proteins has a marked effect on its distribution, elimination, and pharmacological effect. Since only the unbound fraction is available for distribution into extravascular space, the ratio of drug in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or saliva to that in plasma is often regarded as a physiological measure of the free fraction of a drug. CSF : plasma and saliva: plasma ratios of cytosine arabinoside (araC) have been measured in patients with acute leukaemia and found to be 0.1-0.28, implying a binding of 72-90%.The protein binding of araC was measured by equilibrium dialysis in the plasma of patients 'with acute leukaemia at presentation. The mean binding ratio was 2.3 ±6.8, implying that there was little or no protein binding. There was no correlation between alpha-I acid glycoprotein (AAG) levels and protein binding. The low CSF and saliva: plasma araC ratios found, suggest that drugs such as araC which have low lipid solubility do not pass freely into extravascular space. Thus the CSF or saliva: plasma ratio cannot be considered a good physiological measure of protein binding for drugs with poor lipid solubility.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.