The survival of transfused red cells (RBCs) diminishes with time of in vitro storage in blood banks, but the molecular mechanisms underlying the slow but incessant deterioration are incompletely understood. To investigate the possibility that impaired resistance to autologous complement attack could play a role in this phenomenon, packed RBCs stored for variable periods were assayed for decay-accelerating factor (DAF) and CD59, two glycoinositol-phospholipid (GPI)-anchored, membrane-associated complement regulatory proteins that function physiologically to protect blood cells from autologous complement activation on their surfaces. Immunoradiometric and flow cytometric assays employing DAF and CD59 monoclonal antibodies showed that levels of both surface proteins gradually declined over 6 weeks. Digestion analyses with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, an enzyme that releases GPI-anchored proteins from cell surfaces, showed that DAF and CD59 molecules with GPI anchors containing unacylated inositol were preferentially lost. These findings suggest: 1) that DAF and CD59 molecules with acylated GPI anchors are more stable in RBC membranes than are molecules with unacylated GPI anchors, and 2) that DAF and CD59 loss may participate with other membrane alterations that occur during in vitro storage in compromising the survival of transfused cells.

No abstract

Severe life-threatening autoimmune hemolytic anemia, in this instance induced by an autoanti-U, may be associated with IgG2 autoantibody and characterized by apparent intravascular hemolysis and bone marrow dyserythropoiesis. Early treatment with U- blood, in addition to steroids, may be beneficial.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the major cause of posttransfusion hepatitis. Two anti-HCV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits and one recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) were used to test serum samples of 1476 donations from 692 autologous blood donors to assess the prevalence of anti-HCV and its relationship to transfusion history. Of all autologous blood donations, 23 (1.6%) reacted when tested with one EIA kit and 29 (2.0%) reacted when tested by the other EIA kit. Of the autologous donors, 12 (1.78%) reacted by the first EIA kit and 14 (2.02%) by the second. Discrepancies in the EIA results from different donations by the same donor were seen in seven donors. The RIBA was positive or indeterminate in 33 percent of the EIA-reactive donations and in 41 percent of EIA-reactive donors. All RIBA-positive and -indeterminate samples reacted with both EIA kits. There was no significant difference in the EIA-reactive rates of autologous and first-time homologous blood donors. Previously transfused autologous blood donors had a higher anti-HCV EIA-reactive rate than nontransfused autologous donors, but the difference was not significant. In regard to hepatitis C, the use of autologous blood for homologous transfusion appears to be as safe as the use of blood from first-time homologous donors. Universal testing of previously transfused patients for hepatitis C appears premature at this time. Discrepant anti-HCV EIA results from different donations from the same individual have implications regarding donor deferral.