The crowned dens syndrome (CDS), also known as periodontoid calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate crystal deposition disease, is typified clinically by severe cervical pain, neck stiffness and atlantoaxial synovial calcification which could be misdiagnosed as meningitis, epidural abscess, polymyalgia rheumatica, giant cell arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, cervical spondylitis or metastatic spinal tumor. Crystalline deposition on cervical vertebrae is less well known disease entity and only a limited number of cases have been reported to date. Authors report a case of CDS and describe the clinical feature.

The aim of this study is to investigate the factors that may be related to bone graft infection and to contribute to lower the infection rate. According to current studies, the rate of bone graft infection after cranioplasty was reported up to 15.9% and this is significantly high. There are many analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection, but this issue may need to be reconsidered in that the current medical environment is ever-changing. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the demographic, clinical data of 130 patients who underwent cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy from January 2004 to December 2011. We analyzed several factors influencing bone graft infection and divided them into three categories of clinical, operation-related and hematological factors including white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein and albumin. Statistical significance was done by chisquare test, Fisher's test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The infection occurred in 12 patients in 130 cranioplasties (9.2%). There was no difference in infection rate between each group of early and later surgery, graft material, cause of craniectomy. Among many factors, low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS≤8) and combined ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt were significantly correlated with bone graft infection (p= 0.025, p=0.025, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in hematological analysis between groups. Conclusion: Low GCS and combined VP shunt with cranioplasty may increase the risk of bone graft infection.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of multisession radiosurgery to those of single dose radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors.MethodsBetween February 2008 and February 2012, 90 patients with 196 metastatic brain tumors were treated with cyberknife radiosurgery, and we reviewed these patients retrospectively. Among them, 57 patients underwent single dose radiosurgery, and 33 patients multisession radiosurgery. Tumors involving the eloquent area and large tumors (>5 cc) were treated with multisession radiosurgery. The median tumor volume and the median treatment dose of single dose radiosurgery were 2.05±0.72 cc and 19.76±1.54 Gy respectively, and in the case of multisession radiosurgery, 5.30±1.70 cc and 29.6±1.70 Gy respectively. The frequency of multisession dose was 3 to 5 times, on average 3.55 times, and 8.91 Gy were given per 1 session on average.ResultsThe overall survival (OS) of multisession radiosurgery was 16.0 months, whereas that of single dose radiosurgery was 11.5 months. The radiologic tumor response rates were 90% in single dose radiosurgery and 95.4% in multisession radiosurgery, respectively. Over 6-month and 1-year periods, the OS rates of single dose radiosurgery were 71.4% and 44.9%, whereas those of multisession radiosurgery were 69.1% and 58.3%, respectively (p=0.83). Toxicities were seen in 18.1% in the single dose radiosurgery group versus 4% in the multisession radiosurgery group. The difference was significant (p<0.05).ConclusionIn this study, the multisession radiosurgery group, despite the location and size constraints, did not differ from the single dose radiosurgery group when comparing the survival and recurrence rates, but complications and toxicity were lower. Thus, multisession radiosurgery is thought to be beneficial for treatment of large tumors and tumors located in the eloquent area.

No abstract

Therefore, early identification and treatment is most important to improve neurological outcome. Though repeated computerized tomography (CT) scans and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and serial neurological examinations are used for early identification, it is also important to identify the predictable risk factors above all.The goals of this study were to identify the risk factors for postoperative progression, and to compare the results with other previous reviews, and to prepare for neurological deterioration effectively. Materials and Methods Patient population and dataA retrospective review of 335 patients who experienced operation after TBI between 2001 and 2010 was performed. Of total 335 patients, we excluded 33 patients having operation due to simple or compound comminuted depressed fractures which were not combined with hematoma showing mass effect or requiring immediate evacuation. We also excluded the case which had been operated in other institute and transferred out to our hospital followed by secondary operation, due to the unavailability of initial data. In addition, we excluded the patients of initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) below 4 or having multiple systemic trauma, due to the difficulty in evaluation of progression and the lack of viability.Among 302 patients except for those cases, 36 patients required reoperation due to hemorrhagic progression fol- Objective: Progression after operation in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often correlated with morbidity and poor outcome. We have investigated to characterize the natural course of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and to identify the risk factors for postoperative progression in TBI. Methods: 36 patients requiring reoperation due to hemorrhagic progression following surgery for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage were identified in a retrospective review of 335 patients treated at our hospital between 2001 and 2010. We reviewed the age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale, the amount of hemorrhage, the type of hemorrhage, rebleeding site, coagulation profiles, and so on. Univariate statistics were used to examine the relationship between the risk factors and reoperation. Results: Acute subdural hematoma was the most common initial lesion requiring reoperation. Most patients had a reoperation within 24-48 hours after operation. Peri-lesional edema (p=0.002), and initial volume of hematoma (p=0.013) were the possible factors of hemorrhagic progression requiring reoperation. But preoperative coagulopathy was not risk factor of hemorrhagic progression requiring reoperation. Conclusion: Peri-lesional edema and initial volume of hematoma were the statistical significant factors requiring reoperation. Close observation with prompt management is needed to improve the outcome even in patient without coagulopathy. (Korean J Neurotrauma 2013;9:114-119) KEY WORDS: Traumatic brain injury ㆍRebleeding ㆍProgression ㆍRisk factor ㆍReoperation.