Objective
The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate U/S guided serratus anterior plane catheter block (SAPB) versus patient‐controlled analgesia (PCA) on the emergence of post‐thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) after thoracotomies for thoracic tumours.
Methods
This trial included 89 patients with chest malignancies, scheduled for thoracotomy were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A "PCA–group N=44" receiving patient‐controlled analgesia and group B "SAPB group N=45" where analgesia was provided by SAPB. The primary outcome measure was the assessment for the possible emergence of PTPS at 12 weeks. The secondary outcome measures were pain relief measured using visual analog scale (VAS) score, Quality of life was assessed using Flanagan Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) and Activity level was assessed using Barthel Activity of daily living (ADL) score.
Results
At week 8, PTPS incidence was significantly (p = .037) higher in the PCA group (45%) than in the SAPB group (24%) with a relative risk of 1.38 and 95% CI (1.01–1.9) while the incidence of PTPS at week 12 was significantly (p = .035) higher in the PCA group (43%) than in the SAPB group (22%) with a relative risk of 2.38 and 95% CI (1.23–4.57). The need for pain therapy in PTPS patients was significantly lower in the SAPB group (17.7%) than the PCA group (38.6%) (p = .028) at week 12. Pain intensity: VAS‐R and VAS‐D (pain scores at rest and with activity, respectively) was comparable (p > .05) between both groups at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hr, however VAS was significantly higher in the PCA group at week 8 (p = .046) and week 12 (p = .032) . Both groups were comparable regarding ADL and QOL scores (p > .05).
Conclusion
Serratus anterior plane block is assumed to be a good alternative for post‐thoracotomy analgesia following thoracotomies. The current work hypothesized that SAPB for a week postoperatively, may reduce the emergence of PTPS and may reduce the demand for pain therapy in those patients.
Significance statement
The current work hypothesized that SAPB for a week postoperatively, is a good loco‐regional alternative for post‐thoracotomy analgesia following thoracotomies for chest malignancies, it may reduce the emergence of PTPS and the demand for pain therapy in these patients.
Excellent pain relief and reduced consumption of analgesics for more than 6 months were observed in patients who received PRF combined with CRF to the GG for treatment of idiopathic TN.
Background:Breast cancer is a common neoplastic tumor in women, and the postmastectomy pain syndrome has been reported frequently after surgical treatment. The injury of the intercostobrachial nerve is considered the major cause of this type of pain.Purpose:Evaluation of efficacy and safety of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and steroid injection on the 2nd and 3rd thoracic (T2 and T3) dorsal root ganglions (DRGs) for intercostobrachial neuralgia (ICBN) postmastectomy.Patients and Methods:This study was conducted on 100 patients with ICBN postmastectomy. The PRF waves were applied for 120 s twice on T2 and T3 DRGs then 1 ml of 4 mg dexamethasone and 1 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% were injected at each level then the technique was repeated three times 1 week apart for each patient.Results:After 6 months from the latest intervention, the mean of visual analog scale dropped from 7.48 to 4.7 (P = 0.005712) and the mean of the quality of life scale improved to 6.88 after being 4.66 (P < 0.00001) before the intervention and 64.68% of the patients decided that they would certainly repeat the procedure if they could go back in time and 66.64% would certainly recommend the same procedure to a family member. The analgesics consumption decreased mainly in the 1st month but increased again after 6 months (not significant). No serious complications were recorded.Conclusions:PRF and steroid injection on T2 and T3 DRGs assumed an effective and safe method for ICBN postmastectomy treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.