No abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEDocking studies predict that the insecticides, lindane and fipronil, block GABAA receptors by binding to 6′ pore-lining residues. However, this has never been tested at any Cys-loop receptor. The neurotoxic effects of these insecticides are also thought to be mediated by GABAA receptors, although a recent morphological study suggested glycine receptors mediated fipronil toxicity in zebrafish. Here we investigated whether human a1, a1b, a2 and a3 glycine receptors were sufficiently sensitive to block by either compound as to represent possible neurotoxicity targets. We also investigated the mechanisms by which lindane and fipronil inhibit a1 glycine receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHGlycine receptors were recombinantly expressed in HEK293 cells and insecticide effects were studied using patch-clamp electrophysiology. KEY RESULTSBoth compounds completely inhibited all tested glycine receptor subtypes with IC50 values ranging from 0.2-2 mM, similar to their potencies at vertebrate GABAA receptors. Consistent with molecular docking predictions, both lindane and fipronil interacted with 6′ threonine residues via hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds. In contrast with predictions, we found no evidence for lindane interacting at the 2′ level. We present evidence for fipronil binding in a non-blocking mode in the anaesthetic binding pocket, and for lindane as an excellent pharmacological tool for identifying the presence of b subunits in ab heteromeric glycine receptors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONSThis study implicates glycine receptors as novel vertebrate toxicity targets for fipronil and lindane. Furthermore, lindane interacted with pore-lining 6′ threonine residues, whereas fipronil may have both pore and non-pore binding sites. AbbreviationsImax, saturating current magnitude; M2, second transmembrane domain; M3, third transmembrane domain; nH, Hill coefficient; WT, wild type

No abstract

No abstract