. Acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss reduces the ability to localize sounds and to discriminate in background noise. . Four controlled trials attempt to determine the benefit of contralateral bone anchored hearing aids over contralateral routing of signal (CROS) hearing aids and over the unaided condition. All found no significant improvement in auditory localization with either aid. Speech discrimination in noise and subjective questionnaire measures of auditory abilities showed an advantage for bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA) > CROS > unaided conditions. . All four studies have material shortfalls: (i) the BAHA was always trialled after the CROS aid; (ii) CROS aids were only trialled for 4 weeks; (iii) none used any measure of hearing handicap when selecting subjects; (iv) two studies have a bias in terms of patient selection; (v) all studies were underpowered (vi) double reporting of patients occurred. . There is a paucity of evidence to support the efficacy of BAHA in the treatment of acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Clinicians should proceed with caution and perhaps await a larger randomized trial. . It is perhaps only appropriate to insert a BAHA peg at the time of vestibular schwanoma tumour excision in patients with good preoperative hearing, as their hearing handicap increases most.

These findings help the clinician in counseling the patient preoperatively about dizziness handicap to be expected postoperatively. In particular, the clinician is now able to take an informed and positive stance in the event of a severe canal paresis preoperatively.

No abstract

For research into tinnitus to be robust and credible, the use of well-validated instruments of self-perceived tinnitus handicap as outcome measures is essential. The tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) and the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ) are two such instruments which are in widespread use. Both questionnaires were administered by mail to 100 consecutive new patients of the Cambridge Tinnitus Clinic, and completed in randomized order. These patients had been referred by the otolaryngology team and had not undergone any tinnitus therapy. The response rate was 78 per cent, neither questionnaire being more acceptable to patients than the other. The convergent validity of the instruments was high, with total and subscale scores all being significantly correlated at the five per cent level (Spearman correlation coefficients). A number of subscale scores were not significantly correlated at the one per cent level however. In particular, the sleep disturbance element of the TQ was demonstrated to have some discriminant validity from the THI and from other elements of the TQ at the one per cent significance level. The THI and TQ have been demonstrated to have high convergent validity and are both suitable for tinnitus outcome studies involving the quantification of self-perceived tinnitus handicap. For research that aims to determine the specific effect of an intervention on tinnitus-related sleep disturbance, the TQ sleep subscale has potential utility. The hypothetical constructs of tinnitus handicap underlying the psychologist-developed TQ and the audiologist-developed THI have been shown to be convergent.

No abstract