The year 2020 represents a historically turbulent period for the United States marked by the COVID-19 pandemic, a contentious political season, and heightened awareness of racism among citizens. This intersection of medicine, politics, and social unrest generated a demanding clinical environment for healthcare workers, including understudied groups such as physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language pathologists. This descriptive qualitative study focused on experiences and perspectives of clinical rehabilitation therapists working in inpatient rehabilitation and acute-care units from September to November, 2020. Thirteen participants completed individual, semi-structured interviews focused on clinical practice and coping strategies. The analysis included a multi-step, inductive process. Four interconnecting factors chronicling participants’ experiences emerged: sociopolitical, institutional, hospital unit, and personal. Stressors and buffers were noted that further shaped individual experiences. Utilization of an ecological framework provided a way to recognize the impact of a complex range of social and environmental factors affecting participants’ experiences on personal and professional levels. Awareness of rehabilitation therapists’ experiences enriches understanding of the pandemic’s effect on healthcare workers and presents clinical implications for healthcare systems to promote therapist well-being.

Introduction: Recent changes in reimbursement policies for inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) providers prompted the adoption of Quality Indicators (QI) on the IRF Patient Assessment Instrument leading to the discontinuation of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Given that the FIM has shown associations with motor assessments and self-efficacy measures during early stroke recovery, the purpose of this study was to confirm if similar associations exist with QI. Methods: Participants with acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke completed a battery of assessments at the time of IRF admission and discharge: Total QI (summation of self-care and mobility items), Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ). We determined associations between QI and these measures by computing correlation coefficients with an alpha value=.01 denoting significance following a Bonferroni correction. Results: Fourteen individuals (7 females, age=65.9±9.0 years, 8.1±3.5 days post-stroke) with moderate-severe motor deficit completed study procedures. Table 1 summarizes admission and discharge scores and associations with QI. Conclusions: Significant associations between motor assessments and QI from this ongoing study parallel similar associations involving the FIM. The implementation of QI in IRFs necessitates additional work to validate our findings and to determine psychometric properties of QI to enhance clinical research in stroke rehabilitation.

No abstract