Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kedudukan hukum bagi anak laki-laki sebagai ahli waris yang melangsungkan perkawinan nyentana menurut hukum adat Bali sehingga mengakibatkan status dari anak laki-laki tersebut berubah yang awalnya berstatus purusa menjadi pradana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan kasus hukum. Penelitian ini mengkaji Putusan PN Gianyar Nomor 55/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Gin berdasarkan Keputusan Majelis Utama Desa Pakraman Bali Nomor 01/KEP/PSM-3/MDP Bali/X/2010. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa masyarakat Bali pada umumnya menggunakan sistem kekeluargaan patrilineal, namun dengan melangsungkan perkawinan nyentana maka menggunakan sistem kekeluargaan matrilineal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa anak laki-laki yang melangsungkan perkawinan nyentana sehingga statusnya menjadi pradana termasuk dalam kategori ninggal kedaton terbatas, artinya bahwa pihak pradana juga bisa memperoleh haknya sebagai ahli waris sekaligus tetap menjalankan kewajibannya sebagaimana yang dilakukan oleh pihak purusa. A Male Rights Who Did Nyentana Marriage This study aims to analyses the legal position of a male as heirs who perform Nyentana marriages according to Balinese customary law, which causes the status of the man changing from being Purusa to Pradana. This study uses a normative juridical method, with a legal approach and a legal case. This study examines the Decision of the Gianyar District Court Number 55/Pdt.G/2014/ PN.Gin based on the Decision of the Main Assembly of Pakraman Village Bali Number 01/KEP/PSM-3/MDP Bali/X/2010. This study found that Balinese people generally used the Patrilineal family system, but by holding Nyentana marriage the Matrilineal family system was implemented. The results showed that male who carry out Nyentana marriages so that their status as Pradana was included in ‘Ninggal Kedaton terbatas’ category, meaning that Pradana could also obtain their rights as heirs while continuing to run their obligations as the Purusa do.

Effective procurement of goods and services in the Surabaya City Government area is essential to ensure that public funds are spent accountably and transparently. As such, there is an urgent need to examine the legal aspects of business contracts for the procurement of government goods and services in the city of Surabaya. The purpose of this study is to determine the factors that influence the occurrence of default by the Goods and Services Provider, as well as the responsibility of the regional head in the abuse of authority in the procurement of goods and services of local government. The research method uses normative juridical methods with a statutory approach and concept approach. The results of the findings in this study are that there are internal and external factors that make the occurrence of default where the agreement in an agreement is not implemented. Law Number 32 of 2004 concerning Regional Government for the implementation of legal liability of regional heads can be used as a guideline for the mechanism of legal liability of regional heads. The implementation of personal legal responsibility can be subject to article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption, as well as the return of state losses according to article 59 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 2004 concerning State Treasury and article 18 letter b of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption. By shedding light on the legal framework that underpins procurement contracts in Surabaya, this study provides valuable insights for policymakers, public officials, and other stakeholders seeking to ensure the effective use of public funds in Surabaya City Government procurement.