Aim: To determine whether there is a long-term benefit of MRI-guided bilateral anterior capsulotomy in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. Methods: 116 patients (16 patients did not complete the follow-up evaluation) with refractory schizophrenia who underwent capsulotomy were included. The treatment effect was evaluated using a series of international rating scales. Evaluations were performed at baseline, 3 weeks and 24 months after surgery. Results: The rate of effectiveness was 74% according to the Clinical Global Impression evaluation, and there was an obvious improvement based on the statistical analysis for Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (baseline vs. 24 months after surgery, 6.86 ± 8.12, 10.70 ± 8.70 vs. 26.65 ± 4.85, 21.66 ± 7.19), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (14.75 ± 13.21 vs. 44.97 ± 9.36), Activities of Daily Living Scale (18.06 ± 6.58 vs. 24.61 ± 8.95), Social Disability Screening Schedule (6.69 ± 6.12 vs. 15.06 ± 3.18) and Global Assessment Scale (74.35 ± 12.75 vs. 48.74 ± 9.18). Among all the symptoms of schizophrenia, aggressive behavior (82% response rate), hallucination, (71% response rate) and delusion (70% response rate) showed the best response. Conclusion: Our research indicates that capsulotomy is a relatively safe and effective intervention for patients with refractory schizophrenia. It could be an alternative therapy for those patients with chronic and severe schizophrenia. But there must be strict inclusion criteria considering the complications and irreversibility of this procedure.

ObjectiveTo determine whether or not detailed cystic feature analysis on CT scans can assist in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from serous cystadenoma (SCN), mucinous cystadenoma (MCN), and a pseudocyst.Materials and MethodsThis study received Institutional Review Board approval and informed patient consent was waived. Electronic radiology and pathology databases were searched to identify patients with PDAC (n = 19), SCN (n = 26), MCN (n = 20) and a pseudocyst (n = 23) who underwent pancreatic CT imaging. The number, size, location, and contents of cysts, and the contour of the lesions were reviewed, in addition to the wall thickness, enhancement patterns, and other signs of pancreatic and peripancreatic involvement. Diagnosis was based on lesion resection (n = 82) or on a combination of cytological findings, biochemical markers, and tumor markers (n = 6). Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the results.ResultsA combination of the CT findings including irregular contour, multiple cysts, mural nodes, and localized thickening, had a relatively high sensitivity (74%) and specificity (75%) for differentiating PDAC from SCN, MCN, and pseudocysts (p < 0.05). Other CT findings such as location, greatest dimension, or the presence of calcification were not significantly different.ConclusionThe CT findings for PDAC are non-specific, but perhaps helpful for differentiation. PDAC should be included in the general differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.