SARS-CoV-2 transmission occurs even among fully vaccinated individuals; thus, prompt identification of infected patients is central to control viral circulation. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) are highly specific, but sensitivity is variable. Discordant RT- qPCR vs Ag-RDT results are reported, raising the question of whether negative Ag-RDT in positive RT-qPCR samples could imply the absence of infectious viruses. To study the relationship between a negative Ag-RDT results with virological, molecular, and serological parameters, we selected a cross sectional and a follow-up dataset and analyzed virus culture, subgenomic RNA quantification, and sequencing to determine infectious viruses and mutations. We demonstrated that a positive SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT result correlates with the presence of infectious virus in nasopharyngeal samples. A decrease in sgRNA detection together with an expected increase in detectable anti-S and anti-N IgGs was verified in negative Ag-RDT / positive RT-qPCR samples. The data clearly demonstrates the less likelihood of a negative Ag-RDT sample to harbor infectious SARS-CoV-2 and consequently with a lower transmissible potential.

Community testing is a crucial tool for the early identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission control. The emergence of the highly mutated Omicron variant (B.1.1.259) raised concerns about its primary site of replication, impacting sample collection, and its detectability by rapid antigens tests. We tested the Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Test (Ag-RDT) performance using nasal, oral, and saliva specimens for COVID-19 diagnosis in 192 symptomatic individuals, using RT-qPCR from nasopharyngeal samples as control. Variant of Concern (VOC) investigation was determined by the 4Plex SARS-CoV-2 screening kit. SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate was 66.2%, with 99% of the positive samples showing an amplification profile consistent with that of the Omicron variant. Nasal Ag-RDT showed higher sensitivity (89%) than oral (12.6%) and saliva (22.1%) Ag-RDTs. Our data showed the good performance of the Ag-RDT in a pandemic scenario dominated by the Omicron VOC. Furthermore, our data also demonstrated that nasal specimens perform better than oral and saliva ones for Omicron Ag-RDT detection.