Introduction. Contrast, eccentricity and position of stimuli used on research of attention in human vision strongly vary among studies. Aim. To study how contrast, eccentricity and position affects detection of stimuli in humans. Subjects and methods. In adults with normal vision, we measured response times to stimuli (gray circles of 0.5º of diameter) presented at random at eight polar coordinates, in three eccentricities with respect of fixation point (2.15, 3.83 and 5.53º) and with three levels of contrast (6, 16 and 78%). Results. Stimuli with eccentricity of 5.38º and 6% of contrast showed the longest response times. In all eccentricities studied, longer response times were found with stimuli of 6% of contrast. Response times of stimuli of 16% and 78% of contrast showed similar response times in all eccentricities studied. Response times founded at eight polar coordinates were heterogeneous at eccentricities of 2.15 and 5.53º, but not at 3.83º. Conclusions. Contrast is the factor that most influence detection of visual stimuli used in this study, particularly at the biggest eccentricity employed. Response times among polar coordinates are also affected by eccentricities of 2.15 and 5.53º, suggesting that distance of stimuli to fixation point is critical for visual detection of stimuli.

Objective: To study the effect of check width size of the stimuli on the amplitude and latency of the P100 component of visual evoked potentials recorded in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Methods: Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (PVEPs) were recorded in 16 RP patients and 20 visually normal subjects. Pattern reversal stimuli with five different check widths and 100% of contrast were projected in the right eye of both patients and control subjects. PVEPs induced by stimuli with 78%, 16%, and 6% of contrast were also recorded in 10 of the control subjects. Results: In RP patients, the amplitude of P100 was smaller than controls in all check sized used and the peak P100 amplitude was obtained with a larger check width than in controls. P100 was also delayed in RP patients in all check sizes studied. The P100 amplitude- and latency-check size functions of RP patients were like those found in control subjects with low contrast stimuli of 16% and 6%. Conclusion: The PVEPs spatial functions of RP patients show quantitative and qualitative changes, suggesting disease induced alteration in the neural processing of stimulus contrast.