Objective: To evaluate the optimal sequence for the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (rTKIs) sorafenib and sunitinib in metastatic renal cell cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who had received sequential therapy with both rTKIs and integrated these results into a pooled analysis of available data from other publications. Differences in median progression-free survival (PFS) for first- (PFS1) and second-line treatment (PFS2), and for the combined PFS (PFS1 plus PFS2) were examined using weighted linear regression. Results: In the pooled analysis encompassing 853 patients, the median combined PFS for first-line sunitinib and 2nd-line sorafenib (SuSo) was 12.1 months compared with 15.4 months for the reverse sequence (SoSu; 95% CI for difference 1.45–5.12, p = 0.0013). Regarding first-line treatment, no significant difference in PFS1 was noted regardless of which drug was initially used (0.62 months average increase on sorafenib, 95% CI for difference –1.01 to 2.26, p = 0.43). In second-line treatment, sunitinib showed a significantly longer PFS2 than sorafenib (average increase 2.66 months, 95% CI 1.02–4.3, p = 0.003). Conclusion: The SoSu sequence translates into a longer combined PFS compared to the SuSo sequence. Predominantly the superiority of sunitinib regarding PFS2 contributed to the longer combined PFS in sequential use.

Background: We report the case of a patient who experienced a severe neurologic complication after treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Case Report: A 62-yearold patient was diagnosed with a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone under prophylactic G-CSF substitution. After the second cycle she developed severe neurologic complications with generalized seizures and soporous condition. The MRI showed bilateral areas of signal hyperintensity in the subcortical and cortical regions in both hemispheres, consistent with the diagnosis of a reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. The patient was under surveillance in intensive care, and a meticulous control of the blood pressure was performed. She fully recovered within a few days, and MRI changes normalized. Antineoplastic treatment had to be continued, and we chose a combination of rituximab, doxorubicin, etoposide, and prednisone. Conclusions: The reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome is believed to be the result of altered cerebral autoregulation with impaired blood flow control and resultant endothelial damage caused by different situations and agents. Several chemotherapy agents have been described in association with the syndrome. However, little is known about the prevalence of the syndrome and the follow-up of these patients, especially their further treatment.

IFNalpha is still an effective and well tolerated therapeutic option. By repeated measurements of sIL2R together with the peripheral blood values, IFNalpha doses can be tapered to the minimal effective dose. The advantages and disadvantage of IFNalpha in regards to the standard treatment in HCL patients are discussed.

Preclinical data indicated a detrimental effect of statins on the anti-lymphoma activity of rituximab. We evaluated the impact of concomitant statin medication on the response and survival of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) as first-line therapy. Medical histories of patients with DLBCL who were treated with R-CHOP as first-line therapy were assessed for concomitant statin use, response after completion of chemotherapy, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, 2-[(18)F]fluor-2-deoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT results after completion of first-line therapy were compared between the groups. Overall, 145 patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP from January 2001 to December 2009 were analyzed. Twenty-one (15%) patients received statins throughout therapy. Five-year EFS was 67.3% in patients without statins compared with 79% in patients receiving statins during R-CHOP (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.15-1.54, p = 0.2). Five-year OS was 81.4% for patients without statins compared with 93.3% for patients taking statins (HR, 0.58; 95% CI 0.07-4.55, p = 0.6). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of complete remissions between the two groups (75% in the non-statin group versus 86% in the statin group, p = 0.45). A trend toward a lower rate of complete metabolic responses in FDG-PET/CT after chemotherapy was seen in patients without statin medication compared with the patients taking statins (84% versus 92%, p = 0.068). Concomitant statin use had no adverse impact on response to chemotherapy, EFS, and OS in patients treated with R-CHOP for DLBCL.

No abstract