No abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked radical shifts in the ways that both health care and health professions education are delivered. Before the pandemic, some degree programs were offered fully online or in a hybrid format, but in-person learning was considered essential to the education and training of health professionals. Similarly, even as the use of telehealth was slowly expanding, most health care visits were conducted in-person. The need to maintain a safe physical distance during the pandemic rapidly increased the online provision of health care and health professions education, accelerating technology adoption in both academic and professional health care settings. Many health care professionals, educators, and patients have had to adapt to new communication modalities, often with little or no preparation. Before the pandemic, the need for cost-effective, robust methodologies to enable teaching across distances electronically was recognized. During the pandemic, online learning and simulation became essential and were often the only means available for continuity of education and clinical training. This paper reviews the transition to online health professions education and delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic and provides recommendations for moving forward.

Aims Across the United States of America, patients are increasingly receiving healthcare using innovative telehealth technologies. As healthcare continues to shift away from traditional office-based visits, providers face new challenges. Telehealth champions are needed to adapt technologies to meet the needs of patients, providers and communities, especially within the realm of primary care specialties. Given these challenges, this intervention aimed to incorporate telemedicine into internal medicine resident training across multiple training years to prepare them for practice in the current and changing healthcare system. Methods Education and telehealth leaders at the Medical University of South Carolina identified key topics relevant to telehealth and the provision of general internal medicine services. With this as a framework, we developed a 3-year longitudinal telehealth curriculum for internal medicine resident physicians, consisting of an introduction to telemedicine equipment in the first year, didactic learning through in-person education and online modules in the second year and experiential learning through remote monitoring of chronic disease in the third year. Participants included approximately 100 internal medicine residents per year (2016–2019). Self-perceived knowledge, comfort and ability to provide telehealth services was assessed via a survey completed before and after participation in the curriculum. Results Resident physicians’ self-reported knowledge of telehealth history, access to care, contributions of telehealth applications and quality of care and communication each improved after completion of the online curriculum. There were also significant improvements in resident comfort and perceived ability to provide telehealth services after participation in the curriculum, as assessed via a survey. Overall, 41% of residents felt their ability to utilize telehealth as part of their current or future practice was greater than average after completion of the online modules compared to only 2% at baseline ( p<0.01). Results also show residents accurately identify barriers to telehealth adoption at the healthcare system level, including the lack of clinical time to implement services (67% post- vs 47% pre-curriculum, p = 0.02), unfamiliarity with concepts (65% post- vs 21% pre-curriculum, p<−0.01) and concerns about consistent provider reimbursement (74% post- vs 39% pre-curriculum, p < 0.01). Conclusion Telemedicine and remote patient monitoring are an increasingly prevalent form of healthcare delivery. Internal medicine residents must be adept in caring for patients utilizing this technology. This curriculum was effective in improving resident comfort and self-efficacy in providing care through telehealth and provided residents with hands-on opportunities through supervised inclusion in remote patient-monitoring services. This curriculum model could be employed and evaluated within other internal medicine residency programmes to determine the feasibility at institutions with and without advanced telehealth centres.

Introduction In the US, obesity rates are higher in rural areas than in urban areas. Rural access to treatment of obesity is limited by a lack of qualified clinicians and by transportation and financial barriers. We describe a telemedicine weight management programme, Wellness Connect, developed through a partnership of academic clinicians and rural primary care providers in South Carolina, and present utilisation and weight outcomes from seven patient cohorts. Methods Eight bi-weekly sessions were provided via telemedicine videoconferencing for groups of patients at these rural primary care clinics. Protocol-based sessions were led by registered dietitians, exercise physiologists and clinical psychologists at a central urban location. Results Of 138 patients who started the programme, 62% ( N = 86) of patients met the criteria for completion. Completers lost an average of 3.5% (standard deviation (SD) = 3.9%) body weight, which was statistically significant ( p < .001) and corresponded with an average loss of 3.8 kg (SD = 4.5 kg). There were no differences in weight change among clinics ( p = .972). Overall, patients and providers reported satisfaction with the programme and identified several challenges to sustainability. Discussion The use of innovative telemedicine interventions continues to be necessary to alleviate barriers to accessing evidence-based services to reduce chronic diseases and decrease obesity rates among rural populations.

African Americans (AA) are more likely to develop and die from cancer than any other racial or ethnic group. The aims of this research were to: (1) evaluate current education materials being implemented in a community-based prostate cancer education program for AA communities; (2) refine materials based on findings from Aim 1; (3) share updated materials with participants from Aim 1 for additional improvements; and (4) disseminate and evaluate the improved education program through a statewide videoconference with AA men and women. AA individuals evaluated the current education program through a mail survey (n=32) and community forum (n=38). Participants reported that the existing prostate cancer education program content could be understood by lay persons, but recommendations for improvement were identified. They included: defining unknown and/or scientific terminology, increasing readability by increasing font size and enlarging images, and including more recent and relevant statistics. Following refinement of the education materials based on survey and forum feedback, a statewide videoconference was implemented. Following the videoconference, participants (25 men; 3 women) reported that they would encourage others to learn more about prostate cancer, talk to their doctor about whether or not to get screened for prostate cancer, and would recommend the conference to others. There is great potential for using this type of iterative approach to education program development with community and clinical partners for others conducting similar work.