Background Cellular therapy clinical applications require large-scale production of stem cells. Therefore, abundance, ease of isolation, and proliferative potential are the most important factors in choosing the appropriate source of cells for transplantation studies. Multipotent stem cells obtained from periodontal ligament (PDL) can be used in periodontal tissue regeneration. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the characteristics of periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs), extracted by either enzymatic digestion or explant methods, and expanded using two different serum types: fetal bovine serum (FBS) and xeno-free platelet lysate (PL). Methods Expanded PDLSCs were assessed for their proliferation capacity, surface markers expression, colony formation, differentiation potential and ability to self-renewal. Most importantly, PDLSCs were evaluated for their ability to produce osteoblasts in vitro. Results PDLSCs isolated by explant method and expanded in PL serve as a promising source of stem cells for osteoblasts regeneration. These cells showed higher proliferation capacity, they retained their stemness characteristics throughout the passages and they revealed an increase in the expression level of osteogenic markers, without showing any karyotypic abnormalities after cell expansion. Conclusions PDLSCs produced using explant extraction method and expanded in cell culture media supplemented with PL provide an excellent source of xeno-free cells for the generation of functional osteoblasts.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) are characterized by extreme genetic and clinical heterogeneity. There are many genes that are known to cause IRD which makes the identification of the underlying genetic causes quite challenging. And in view of the emergence of therapeutic options, it is essential to combine molecular and clinical data to correctly diagnose IRD patients. In this study, we aimed to identify the disease‐causing variants (DCVs) in four consanguineous Jordanian families with IRDs and describe genotype–phenotype correlations. Methods Exome sequencing (ES) was employed on the proband patients of each family, followed by segregation analysis of candidate variants in affected and unaffected family members by Sanger sequencing. Simulation analysis was done on one novel CLRN1 variant to characterize its effect on mRNA processing. Clinical evaluation included history, slit‐lamp biomicroscopy, and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Results We identified two novel variants in CLRN1 [(c.433+1G>A) and (c.323T>C, p.Leu108Pro)], and two recurrent variants in ABCA4 [(c.1648G>A, p.Gly550Arg) and (c.5460+1G>A)]. Two families with the same DCV were found to have different phenotypes and another family was shown to have sector RP. Moreover, simulation analysis for the CLRN1 splice donor variant (c.433+1G>A) showed that the variant might affect mRNA processing resulting in the formation of an abnormal receptor. Also, a family that was previously diagnosed with nonsyndromic RP was found to have Usher syndrome based on their genetic assessment and audiometry. Conclusion Our findings extend the spectrum of CLRN1‐ and ABCA4‐associated IRDs and describe new phenotypes for these genes. We also highlighted the importance of combining molecular and clinical data to correctly diagnose IRDs and the utility of simulation analysis to predict the effect of splice donor variants on protein formation and function.