Nutcracker syndrome is caused by compression of the left renal vein between the aorta and the superior mesenteric artery where it passes in the fork formed at the bifurcation of these arteries. The phenomenon results in left renal venous hypertension. The syndrome is manifested by left flank and abdominal pain, with or without unilateral haematuria. Other common presentation is as "pelvic congestion syndrome" characterized by symptoms of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, post-coital ache, lower abdominal pain, dysuria, pelvic, vulvar, gluteal or thigh varices and emotional disturbances. Likewise compression of the left renal vein can cause left renal-to-gonadal vein reflux resulting in lower limb varices and varicoceles in males. Its diagnosis is based on history and physical examination, basic lab tests to exclude other causes of haematuria, cystoscopy and ureteroscopy to confirm unilateral haematuria and exclude other causes of this sinister symptom. Sequence of imaging has more or less been rationalised to USS with Doppler studies, CT or MR angiography and finally phlebography with renal vein and IVC manometery to confirm the diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE The endoscopic endonasal transmaxillary transpterygoid (TMTP) approach has been the gateway for lateral skull base exposure. Removal of the cartilaginous eustachian tube (ET) and lateral mobilization of the internal carotid artery (ICA) are technically demanding adjunctive steps that are used to access the petroclival region. The gained expansion of the deep working corridor provided by these maneuvers has yet to be quantified. METHODS The TMTP approach with cartilaginous ET removal and ICA mobilization was performed in 5 adult cadaveric heads (10 sides). Accessible portions of the petrous apex were drilled during the following 3 stages: 1) before ET removal, 2) after ET removal but before ICA mobilization, and 3) after ET removal and ICA repositioning. Resection volumes were calculated using 3D reconstructions generated from thin-slice CT scans obtained before and after each step of the dissection. RESULTS The average petrous temporal bone resection volumes at each stage were 0.21 cm, 0.71 cm, and 1.32 cm (p < 0.05, paired t-test). Without ET removal, inferior and superior access to the petrous apex was limited. Furthermore, without ICA mobilization, drilling was confined to the inferior two-thirds of the petrous apex. After mobilization, the resection was extended superiorly through the upper extent of the petrous apex. CONCLUSIONS The transpterygoid corridor to the petroclival region is maximally expanded by the resection of the cartilaginous ET and mobilization of the paraclival ICA. These added maneuvers expanded the deep window almost 6 times and provided more lateral access to the petroclival region with a maximum volume of 1.5 cm. This may result in the ability to resect small-to-moderate sized intradural petroclival lesions up to that volume. Larger lesions may better be approached through an open transcranial approach.
We report the very short operative times and postoperative stay for microsurgery, which are comparable to some endoscopic series. We also report results of objective tests of cognitive performance. With adoption of a callosal incision of 1 cm or less, meticulous dissection around the fornix, and complete excision, acceptable long-term cognitive function and functional performance were achieved. Our results support the microsurgical approach. A larger sample size can more conclusively establish whether it should be chosen over the endoscopic technique.
Olfaction preservation may be feasible in the endoscopic endonasal resection of a unilateral olfactory groove meningioma through a unilateral transcribriform approach with septal transposition and preservation of the contralateral olfactory apparatus.
Background: The majority of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt malfunctions are due to proximal catheter failure. Ideal placement of Ommaya reservoirs is desired to avoid toxicity from intraparenchymal chemotherapy infusion. Objective: To determine whether stereotactic placement of ventricular catheters decreases the rate of Ommaya reservoir complications and the rate of proximal VP shunt failure. Methods: Under institutional review board approval, areview of a prospectively collected database was doneidentifying all patients who underwent stereotactic-guided placement of VP shunts and Ommaya reservoirs performed by a single surgeon between November 2007 and November 2009. Neuronavigation was used to preset a surgical plan consisting of an ideal entry point (usually frontal) and target point (ipsilateral foramen of Monro). The navigation probe was passed along this trajectory. After removal of the navigation probe, pre-sized ventricular catheters were passed without a stylet along the created path. Post-operative CT scans and clinical follow-up were assessed. Results: 70 patients (mean age 44.6 years) underwent 52 VP shunt and 18 Ommaya reservoir placement procedures. Rigid cranial fixation was used in all cases. All catheters were placed in a single pass. Mean operative time was 62 min. Mean follow-up was 16.3 months. No proximal malfunctions or Ommaya complications have been seen thus far. One patient required repositioning of an Ommaya reservoir as post-operative CT showed poor placement (1.4%). One patient with hydrocephalus due to cryptococcal meningitis developed an abdominal abscess and required removal of his entire shunt with subsequent replacement. One patient was noted to have a small amount of intraventricular hemorrhage; this did not result in any clinical change and did not require any further intervention. No other surgical complications were noted. Conclusion: In terms of results corroborating decreased proximal malfunction rates, we present the largest series of stereotactic-guided ventricular catheter placements to date. Though time in the operating room is increased due to navigation registration, actual operative time is comparable to procedures without navigation. A longer-term follow-up is needed to assess the longevity of our positive short-term results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.