Background: Estimated cervical cancer screening practice is very low and load of cases very high in India. The studies document that nurses play a crucial role of enlightening community about need and availability of Pap smear. It is important therefore to understand the perceptions and practices of nurses about cervical cancer and screening. Aims & Objective: To evaluate the Knowledge Attitude & Practices (KAP) of the Nurses on cervical cancer and screening. Material and Methods: A self-administered, structured, open ended and pretested questionnaire covering the general characteristics, KAP about cervical cancer and screening (Pap smear) was used to collect responses of nurses in a Teaching Hospital at Surat. The information thus collected was entered and analysed in Epi Info and Microsoft Excel software. Results: Responses from 200 female nurses were recorded and analysed. Majority (88%) were married; most common age of marriage being 21 to 25 years. Nurses linked multiple sexual partners (61%), sex at an early age (44%), Human Papilloma Virus infection (38.6%) and heredity (31%) to cervical cancer. Approximately 70% believed that Ca cervix is preventable, detectable and curable if detected early. Pap smear was recognized as major screening technique by 74% nurses. Major (84%) source of information was health professional. Eighty percent nurses never took cervical screening while 87.5% did not recommend it to others. Conclusion: For successful implementation of cervical screening program, the nurses should be targeted first by education and sensitization so that they can play pivotal role in developing the awareness, confidence and compliance of women.
Introduction: Caesarean section is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedure in hospitals. But it carries 5-20 fold increase risk of infection compared to vaginal delivery. Analysis of various baseline, intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors predisposing to surgical site infection is necessary to detect common links. obtained information is important to plan a strategy to reduce post caesarean wound infections and its complications.
Material and Method: This is a prospective observational study enrolling 1500 sequentiall consenting subjects who had undergone caesarean section, on surgical site infection following caesarean section.
Results: The cesarean section rate was found to be 41.2%.Subjects over 35 years of age had highest SSI rates of 16.7% and difference in SSI in subjects more than 35years was statistically significant (p value = 0.04)
(88.6%) of the total enrolled subjects undergoing LSCS were antenatally registered amongst which 3.3% developed SSI compared to 11.4% of the total subjects were antenatally unregistered amongst which 5.8% developed SSI (p value=0.04)
1% of the total enrolled subjects undergoing LSCS had a history of gestational diabetes mellitus amongst which 33.3% had SSI , while 99% of the subjects did not have history of gestational diabetes amongst whom SSI incidence was 3.3% (p value <0.01) which is significant.
7.6% of the total enrolled subjects undergoing LSCS had a history of hypertension amongst which 8.8% developed SSI compared to 92.4% of the subjects without hypertension had 3.2% SSI. (p value <0.01) there is a significant association of body mass index with SSI. (p value <0.01).
There is significant association found between preterm rupture of membrane and SSI (p value <0.01).
Conclusion: Strategies for the prevention of post operative BMI must aim to control mother’s pre-conceptual weight, their antenatal registration, follow standard intranatal mangement guidelines, timely administration of prophylactic antibiotic if decision to perform LSCS is to be taken.
Keywords: Surgical site infection, caesarean section.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.