dle ear effusion, led to a decrease in intracochlear ECoG signal amplitudes. This was not attributable to changes of cochlear function. All persistent reductions in ECoG response magnitude after normalization of the tympanogram occurred during the first week following implantation. Thresholds of ECoG signals were at or below hearing thresholds in all cases. Conclusion: Gross intracochlear trauma during surgery appears to be rare. In the early postoperative phase the ability to assess cochlear status by ECoG recordings was limited due to the regular occurrence of middle ear effusion. Still, intracochlear ECoG along with tympanogram recordings suggests that any changes of low-frequency cochlear function occur mainly during the first week after cochlear implantation. ECoG seems to be a promising tool to objectively assess changes in cochlear function in cochlear implant recipients and may allow further insight into the mechanisms underlying the loss of residual hearing.

OBJECTIVE: To monitor changes in cochlear function during cochlear implantation using electrocochleography (ECoG) and to correlate changes to postoperative hearing preservation. METHODS: ECoG responses to acoustic stimuli of 250, 500, and 1000 Hz were recorded during cochlear implantation. The recording electrode was placed on the promontory and stabilized to fix the position during cochlear implantation. Baseline recordings were obtained after completion of the posterior tympanotomy. Changes of the ongoing ECoG response at suprathreshold intensities were analyzed after full insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array. Audiometric tests were conducted before and 4 weeks after surgery and correlated with electrophysiological findings. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent (18/19) of cochlear implant subjects had measurable ECoG responses. Under unchanged conditions, recordings showed a high repeatability without significant differences between 2 recordings (p 0.01). Ninety-four percent (17/18) of subjects showed no relevant changes in ECoG recordings after insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array. One subject showed decreases in responses at all frequencies indicative of cochlear trauma. This was associated with a complete hearing loss 4 weeks after surgery compared with mean presurgical low-frequency hearing of 78 dB HL. CONCLUSION: Extracochlear ECoG is a reliable tool to assess cochlear function during cochlear implantation. Moderate threshold shifts could be caused by postoperative mechanisms or minor cochlear trauma. Detectable changes in extracochlear ECoG recordings, indicating gross cochlear trauma, are probably predictive of complete loss of residual acoustic hearing.

Data show a rather strong relationship between exercise performance and circulating omentin-1 levels as well as an increase of the adipokine in response to 6-week of endurance training in obese women. Our findings may hint to a skeletal muscle-adipose tissue crosstalk in regard of omentin-1 regulation.