Exercise improves mucus clearance in people without lung disease and those with chronic bronchitis. No study has investigated exercise alone for mucus clearance in cystic fibrosis (CF). The aim of this study was to compare the effects of treadmill exercise to resting breathing and airway clearance with positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy on mucus clearance in adults with CF.This 3-day randomised, controlled, crossover trial included 14 adults with mild to severe CF lung disease (forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted 31–113%). Interventions were 20 min of resting breathing (control), treadmill exercise at 60% of the participant's peak oxygen consumption or PEP therapy (including huffing and coughing). Mucus clearance was measured using the radioaerosol technique and gamma camera imaging.Treadmill exercise improved whole lung mucus clearance compared to resting breathing (mean difference 3%, 95% CI 2–4); however, exercise alone was less effective than PEP therapy (mean difference −7%, 95% CI −6– −8). When comparing treadmill exercise to PEP therapy, there were no significant differences in mucus clearance from the intermediate and peripheral lung regions, but significantly less clearance from the central lung region (likely reflecting the huffing and coughing that was only in PEP therapy).It is recommended that huffing and coughing are included to maximise mucus clearance with exercise.

BackgroundTreadmill exercise and airway clearance with the Flutter® device have previously been shown to improve mucus clearance mechanisms in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) but have not been compared. It is therefore not known if treadmill exercise is an adequate form of airway clearance that could replace established airway clearance techniques, such as the Flutter®. The aim of this study was to evaluate respiratory flow, sputum properties and subjective responses of treadmill exercise and Flutter® therapy, compared to resting breathing (control).MethodsTwenty-four adults with mild to severe CF lung disease (FEV1 28–86% predicted) completed a three-day randomised, controlled, cross-over study. Interventions consisted of 20 min of resting breathing (control), treadmill exercise at 60% of the participant’s peak oxygen consumption and Flutter® therapy. Respiratory flow was measured during the interventions. Sputum properties (solids content and mechanical impedance) and subjective responses (ease of expectoration and sense of chest congestion) were measured before, immediately after the interventions and after 20 min of recovery.ResultsTreadmill exercise and Flutter® resulted in similar significant increases in peak expiratory flow, but only Flutter® created an expiratory airflow bias (i.e. peak expiratory flow was at least 10% higher than peak inspiratory flow). Treadmill exercise and Flutter® therapy resulted in similar significant reductions in sputum mechanical impedance, but only treadmill exercise caused a transient increase in sputum hydration. Treadmill exercise improved ease of expectoration and Flutter® therapy improved subjective sense of chest congestion.ConclusionsA single bout of treadmill exercise and Flutter® therapy were equally effective in augmenting mucus clearance mechanisms in adults with CF. Only longer term studies, however, will determine if exercise alone is an adequate form of airway clearance therapy that could replace other airway clearance techniques.Trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Registration number #ACTRN12609000168257, Retrospectively registered (Date submitted to registry 26/2/2009, First participant enrolled 27/2/2009, Date registered 6/4/2009).Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-016-0360-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.