Background: Indoor air pollutants are increasingly being associated with respiratory illnesses leading to high degree of morbidity and mortality. There are not sufficient epidemiological studies from Pakistan which assess level of awareness of indoor air pollution resulting in respiratory diseases in population. Methods: This cross sectional survey was carried out on general population of Rawalpindi/Islamabad. Sample size was 223 study subjects selected by non-probability convenient sampling. Knowledge of the study subjects was determined with regard to indoor air pollution, its effects on health and different sources of indoor air pollution with the help of a questionnaire. The influence of age, gender, educational status and socio economic status on the level of awareness was also analyzed. Results: Out of total 223 participants, 115 were males and108 females. Participants aware of indoor air pollution were 91.5% and adequate awareness about its sources was 80.7%. Those who knew indoor air pollution is detrimental to health were 95.1%. Awareness about building construction dust as source of indoor air pollution was maximum (84.8%). There was significant difference in awareness among participants with different monthly incomes and educational status and also between males and females. Conclusion: This study concludes that general population of Rawalpindi/Islamabad has fairly good awareness about sources of indoor air pollution. Use of harmful material causing indoor air pollution should be limited or substituted with better ones where possible.

IntroductionAn unsafe abortion is a persistent, preventable dilemma. It is a procedure where an unintended pregnancy is terminated either by untrained individuals, or in an environment not meeting medical standards, or both, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). It endangers women in developing countries, where abortion is restricted either by law and culture or legally permitted but not easily accessible. Induced abortions are usually performed by unqualified and untrained individuals or are self-induced. Such incidents take place in unhygienic conditions and involve inappropriate methods or administration of medications. Even if carried out by medical experts, a clandestine abortion carries an additional risk, medical coverage is not immediately available in an emergency and the woman may not receive appropriate post-abortion attention. Induced abortion-related complications happen and the woman may hesitate to seek medical care. Unsafe abortion-induced complications contribute a major burden, such as increased hospital stay, drug costs, and an unusual delay of other operations on gynecological services in developing countries. The purpose of this study was to seek an association between low socioeconomic status and complications related to unsafe abortion.Materials and methodsA total of 296 female patients of child-bearing age presented between 2012 and 2015 in the emergency department (ED), Nishtar Hospital, Multan, after an unsafe abortion, were included. Spontaneous miscarriages and abortions cases carried out on legal or medical grounds were excluded. Patient or their attendants (who usually present the real picture of incidents leading towards unsafe abortion) were interviewed for determinants leading to unsafe abortion. A detailed clinical assessment of the patient was done and complications like hemorrhage, uterine perforation, and bowel perforation were recorded along with basic demographic information such as age, gestational age, parity, and weight.ResultsThere were 296 female patients in the study with a mean age 28.391 ± 4.57 (Range: 13-40 years). In a majority of patients, gravida and parity were 5-6. The mean weight was 60.283 ± 9.31 kilograms and the mean gestational age was 7.733 ± 2.45 weeks. The determinant in the shape of poor economic status was 71.6%. Hemorrhage was seen in 30.1% of the patients followed by uterine perforation (49.3%) and bowel perforation (45.6%).ConclusionOur results indicate that unsafe abortion is a major cause of maternal morbidity, mostly because the service is being sought from untrained healthcare providers in unhygienic conditions secondary to poor socioeconomic status. Since maternal morbidity due to unsafe abortion is a violation of a woman's basic human right: the right to life, there is a dire need to prevent these unwanted complications by improving the quality of the family planning program and providing safe abortion services.

No abstract

BackgroundMalaria is one of the primary public health concerns in the world and an important cause of morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. Malaria morbidity is associated with poverty and vulnerability as it is not easy for the poor people to access preventive treatment and protective measures. In Rwanda, malaria prevention has become a major problem against the double-barreled burden of an overstretched health system and strained financial resources.MethodsThis work was a cross-sectional survey study design based on data from Rwanda collected in 2010 through the Malaria Indicator Survey as part of the Demographic and Health Survey. The primary outcome variable was an ordinal variable with three categories; no malaria, probable malaria, and confirmed malaria cases. The outcome variable was formulated by combining rapid malaria test and confirmatory blood smear laboratory test. Statistical analysis was done using survey ordinal logistic regression modelling adjusting for random effects for direct effects and generalised structural equation modelling (G-SEM) to obtain total (direct and indirect) effects of malaria morbidity. ResultsThe 11,865 participants had a mean age of 22 years, and two-thirds of the participants were females (67%). Household related variables (socio-economic status, health insurance, age in years) showed a significant total effect on malaria infection. Socioeconomic status had the greatest total effect which was a sum of the direct and indirect effects influenced indirectly by education, health insurance and the number of rooms for sleeping. Conclusion Poverty is still the core issue to the morbidity patterns driving the malaria epidemic in Rwanda. Access to health insurance has a high positive impact on decreasing disease as such a special focus on some regions can be an effective intervention strategy. A better understanding of the drivers of morbidity directly and/or indirectly can better target interventions to be more efficient in those affected areas.

Background Malaria is one of the primary public health concerns in the world and an important cause of morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. Malaria morbidity is associated with poverty and vulnerability as it is not easy for the poor people to access preventive treatment and protective measures. In Rwanda, malaria prevention has become a major problem against the double-barreled burden of an overstretched health system and strained financial resources.Methods This work was a cross-sectional survey study design based on data from Rwanda collected in 2010 through the Malaria Indicator Survey as part of the Demographic and Health Survey. The primary outcome variable was an ordinal variable with three categories; no malaria, probable malaria, and confirmed malaria cases. The outcome variable was formulated by combining rapid malaria test and confirmatory blood smear laboratory test. Statistical analysis was done using survey ordinal logistic regression modelling adjusting for random effects for direct effects and generalised structural equation modelling (G-SEM) to obtain total (direct and indirect) effects of malaria morbidity. Results The 11,865 participants had a mean age of 22 years, and two-thirds of the participants were females (67%). Household related variables (socio-economic status, health insurance, age in years) showed a significant total effect on malaria infection. Socioeconomic status had the greatest total effect which was a sum of the direct and indirect effects influenced indirectly by education, health insurance and the number of rooms for sleeping in isolation. Conclusion Poverty is still the core issue to the morbidity patterns driving the malaria epidemic in Rwanda. Access to health facility and health insurance has a high positive impact on decreasing disease as such a special focus on some regions can be an effective intervention strategy. A better understanding of the drivers of morbidity directly and/or indirectly can better target interventions to be more efficient in those affected areas.