<p>This research  aims to know how is the synergy of bureaucracy and politics in realizing good governance. More specifically, what are the factors that influence the relationship between bureaucracy and politics in realizing good governance system. This study used a qualitative approach which is give description about the issues. The data collection technique used is literature study by examining and analyzing relevant literature such as books, journal articles, laws and regulations focusing bureaucracy, politics, and good governance systems. The results of the research showed that the synergy between bureaucracy and politics is absolutely necessary to realize good governance system. In addition, factors that affects relationships between them are aspect of authority/ power, human resources, and recruitment system. Bureaucracy and politics must be placed in the same stage to prevent superiority between bureaucracy and politics. A balanced relationship can be transformed into juridical restrictions. The empowerment of professionals in filling bureaucracy and politics must be prioritized in order to reduce corruption and nepotism that occurs in irrational recruitment systems.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Bureaucracy; Good Governance; Politics.</p>

This paper will discuss the initial public offering (IPO) for startup companies. Case study of PT Aplikasi Karya Anak Bangsa Go-Jek. The discussion in this paper will emphasize startups and their comparison with IPOs in ordinary companies (Case Study PT Jasa Armada Indonesia, Tbk) and other startup companies, namely PT Kioson Commercial Indonesia, Tbk) in 2017. A qualitative approach with normative descriptive and benchmark method is used to analyze the problem mention above. This research finds that in general, public regulations and general guidance in Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning the Capital Market and other related regulations sufficient to meet the requirements of going public for public companies. But with the development of startup companies in Indonesia, especially PT Aplikasi Karya Anak Bangsa (Go-Jek), planning to conduct an initial public offering encourages the government to immediately make decisions on the initial public offering process rules so that these arrangements will not only reach ordinary companies with the number of assets large but also able to reach start-up companies to contribute to the development of the national economy.

Introduction to The Problem: The use of information technology innovations in banking today through digital platforms or online or known as financial technology (commonly abbreviated as fintech) can indeed provide financial services to the public at a lower cost than traditional banking methods. But behind the sophistication of technology as well as an increase in banking risk, especially if the regulations that govern it have not been comprehensive. Purpose/Objective Study: This paper examines the development of various regulatory regulations in the field of fintech in Indonesia. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research method used in this study is qualitative through normative legal research. The obtained data analyzed by statutory approach to interpret the existing legal rules on Indonesian Banking. Findings: The results obtained are that the existence of fintech which is considered as disruptive innovation (disruptive innovation) has changed the old market and revolutionized the workings of traditional financial institutions. Therefore, the government through the financial authority that is authorized to respond to the development of fintech in the Indonesian banking system by making various regulations. In addition, the development of fintech business integration with banking institutions must also be a concern for both parties so that the development of fintech is not only a disruption but can also be a safe innovation for customers to use.

This research is a normative legal research. The approach method used in this research is normative juridical. This research is conducted with the study of documentation, namely collecting and researching of legal materials through a search of legal literature based on the act and the related law. This study aims to determine the urgency of whether the leaders of Indonesia's Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) should be given the Immunity Right in performing their duties. This is due to the many obstacles that hinder the Eradication of Corruption in Indonesia and the alleged criminalization addressed to the leadership of the Corruption Eradication Commission in performing. There are efforts from any parties who continue to encourage and want the KPK leaders to be established as a suspect. This can be politically as well as weakening the KPK institution, which currently plays an important role in eradicating corruption in Indonesia. Given the substance of Article 32 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 30 Year 2002 concerning Corruption Eradication Commission, the appointed leader becomes suspect will be temporarily discharged from his position in addition to performing his duties and functions collectively collegial with the stipulation of some KPK Leaders to be suspects will disrupt this institution in combating corruption. Indonesia as a legal state that upholds the principle of equality before the law and also considers that Indonesia is in an emergency of corruption, the application of limited immunity rights against the KPK Leaders guaranteed in a law is a good way. The eradication of corruption must remain focused so that objectives can be achieved immediately. The sincerity of these steps can be pursued by definite regulation of KPK's immunity right.

Act Number 7 of 1992 as amended by Act Number 10 of 1998 concerning Banking and several related rules already regulates the exclusion of banking secrets, especially for tax purposes. However, the existing mechanism has not been able to accommodate the exchange of financial information within the framework of the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI). Then the Financial Information Access Act was formulated which regulates the automatic exchange of financial information that has never been known before. The problems discussed in this study, how are the exceptions of bank secrets for tax purposes that have been carried out in Indonesia and how are bank secrets exceptions regulated in the Financial Information Access Act. The research method used is a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical research approach. The results of the study found that the exception of bank secrets has long been known in Indonesia but is still limited by a convoluted bureaucracy. Whereas in the Financial Information Access Act, exceptions take place automatically but there are sanctions for those who misuse information.