Opitz G/BBB syndrome is a genetically heterogeneous condition, with both autosomal dominant and X-linked forms. The MID1 gene is associated with X-linked Opitz G/BBB syndrome. Most mutations identified are unique, which makes it difficult to assess possible genotype/phenotype correlations. We report on a familial c.1102C>T (p.R368X) mutation in the MID1 gene, previously reported by Cox et al. (Hum Mol Genet 9:2553-2562, 2000), and document it as a recurrent mutation causing Opitz G/BBB syndrome. This mutation may result in various midline defects, including cleft lip/palate, laryngeal cleft, hypertelorism, Dandy-Walker malformation, ventricular septal defect and hypospadias in male patients, with intrafamilial variability. Seven other mutations (c.712G>T, c.829C>T, c.1108A>G, c.1444_1447dupAACA, c.1483C>T, c.1798dupC and entire gene deletions) have been previously reported as recurrent mutations. The presented family with the c.1102C>T mutation provides additional information about the clinical consequences of the nonsense mutation causing premature truncation of the protein at the level of the COS domain.

BackgroundAlthough copy number variation (CNV) has received much attention, knowledge about the characteristics of CNVs such as occurrence rate and distribution in the genome between populations and within the same population is still insufficient. In this study, Illumina 770 K HumanOmniExpress-12 v1.0 (and v1.1) arrays were used to examine the diversity and distribution of CNVs in 286 unrelated individuals from the two main ethnolinguistic groups of the Lithuanian population (Aukštaičiai and Žemaičiai) (see Additional file 3). For primary data analysis, the Illumina GenomeStudio™ Genotyping Module v1.9 and two algorithms, cnvPartition 3.2.0 and QuantiSNP 2.0, were used to identify high-confidence CNVs.ResultsA total of 478 autosomal CNVs were detected by both algorithms, and those were clustered in 87 copy number variation regions (CNVRs), spanning ~12.5 Mb of the genome (see Table 1). At least 8.6 % of the CNVRs were unique and had not been reported in the Database of Genomic Variants. Most CNVRs (57.5 %) were rare, with a frequency of <1 %, whereas common CNVRs with at least 5 % frequency made up only 1.1 % of all CNVRs identified. About 49 % of non-singleton CNVRs were shared between Aukštaičiai and Žemaičiai, and the remaining CNVRs were specific to each group. Many of the CNVs detected (66 %) overlapped with known UCSC gene regions.ConclusionsThe ethnolinguistic groups of the Lithuanian population could not be differentiated based on CNV profiles, which may reflect their geographical proximity and suggest the homogeneity of the Lithuanian population. In addition, putative novel CNVs unique to the Lithuanian population were identified. The results of our study enhance the CNV map of the Lithuanian population.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12863-016-0373-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

Restrictive dermopathy (RD) is a rare lethal autosomal recessive genodermatosis, characterized by abnormally rigid skin with prominent superficial vasculature, erosions and epidermal hyperkeratosis, dysplastic clavicles, joint contractures, mouth fixed in the 'O' position, small pinched nose, and neonatal death. Mutations of ZMPSTE24 and LMNA genes are reported as the causes of RD, with those of ZMPSTE24 being more prevalent. Here, we report on a familial c.50delA (p.Lys17Serfs*21) mutation of the ZMPSTE24 gene, causing RD in two siblings.

Taste has strong evolutionary basis in the sense of survival by influencing our behavior to obtain food/medicine or avoid poisoning. It is a complex trait and varies among individuals and distinct populations. We aimed to investigate the association between known genetic factors (673 SNPs) and taste preference in the Lithuanian population, as well as to determine a reasonable method for qualitative evaluation of a specific taste phenotype for further genetic analysis. Study group included individuals representing six ethnolinguistic regions of Lithuania. Case and control groups for each taste were determined according to the answers selected to the taste-specific and frequency of specific food consumption questions. Sample sizes (case/control) for each taste are as follows: sweetness (55/179), bitterness (82/208), sourness (32/259), saltiness (42/249), and umami (96/190). Genotypes were extracted from the Illumina HumanOmniExpress-12v1.1 arrays' genotyping data. Analysis was performed using PLINK v1.9. We found associations between the main known genetic factors and four taste preferences in the Lithuanian population: sweetness-genes TAS1R3, TAS1R2, and GNAT3 (three SNPs); bitterness-genes CA6 and TAS2R38 (six SNPs); sournessgenes PKD2L1, ACCN2, PKD1L3, and ACCN1 (48 SNPs); and saltiness-genes SCNN1B and TRPV1 (five SNPs). We found our questionnaire as a beneficial aid for qualitative evaluation of taste preference. This was the first initiative to analyze genetic factors related to taste preference in the Lithuanian population. Besides, this study reproduces, supports, and complements results of previous limited taste genetic studies or ones that lack comprehensive results concerning distinct (ethnic) human populations.