cardiac resynchronization, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, pacemaker, Twiddler syndrome, ventricular tachycardia A 77-year-old man received a transvenous cardiac resynchronization device with cardioverter-defibrillation capability (Lumax 640 HF-T; BIOTRONIK). Ten months later, he presented with a shock. Figure 1 shows the data retrieved by interrogating the device.What is the interpretation of the recording and the mechanism of the shock? Why is atrial sensing present in all three channels?The device parameters and marker annotations were as follows: VT1 = programmed ventricular tachycardia interval for antitachycardia pacing (first therapy) 350 ms (170 bpm) and VF = ventricular fibrillation 270 ms (220 bpm). Therapy for VT1 was initiated with antitachycardia pacing (ATP); four bursts first followed by four ATP ramps and then a 40 J shock if ATP was unsuccessful.In Figure 1, the marker channels are on top and the electrograms are below. A = atrium, RV = right ventricle, and LV = left ventricle.There is sinus rhythm at about 115 beats per minute and the third atrial beat is unsensed. There is also atrial undersensing before the shock on the right side of the tracing. Intermittent atrial undersensing is because of the atrial lead displacement. The right ventricular lead shows a double waveform consisting of the atrial and ventricular electrograms. On the right, there is a single episode of Mobitz type II AV block demonstrated by the loss of a ventricular electrogram. The right ventricular lead was displaced to the right atrium where the near-field atrial electrograms and the far-field ventricular electrograms are recorded. The right ventricular channel senses both the atrial and ventricular electrograms resulting in short ventricular intervals alternating with long ones. The short intervals (173-188 ms), depicted by VF markers, correspond to the PR interval. The long intervals, depicted by VT1 markers, measure less than 350 ms (the VT1 interval) except for a longer interval after the non-conducted atrial beat. The device delivers a shock at the end of the tracing as shown by the large baseline deflection. Note that all three leads demonstrate atrial sensing. | LEF T VENTRICUL AR S EN S INGSome implantable devices for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with cardioverter-defibrillator capability, as the one in this report, can sense LV activity. 1 LV sensing functionality was designed primarily to prevent pacing into the vulnerable period of the LV myocardium. Displacement of an LV lead toward the coronary sinus places it where left atrial activity may be sensed. There are no reports of far-field atrial oversensing during sinus rhythm by a correctly positioned LV lead for CRT. 2 Consequently, far-field atrial sensing by an LV lead strongly suggests lead displacement toward the AV groove. Although far-field atrial sensing did not involve the delivery of therapy it contributes to the description of triple atrial sensing. | T WIDDLER SYNDROMEFar-field atrial oversensing in the right and left ventricular lea...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.