Background In recent months numerous health care professional acquired COVID-19 at the workplace resulting in significant shortages in medical and nursing staff. We investigated how prior COVID-19 affects SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and how such knowledge could facilitate frugal vaccination strategies. Methods In a cohort of 41 healthcare professionals with (n=14) and without (n=27) previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, we assessed the immune status before, during and after vaccination with BNT162b2. The humoral immune response was assessed by receptor binding domain ELISA and different SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation assays using wildtype and pseudo-typed viruses. T cell immunity against SARS-CoV-2 surface and nucleocapsid peptides were studied using interferon-γ release assays and intracellular flow cytometry. Vaccine-related side effects were captured. Findings Prior COVID-19 resulted in improved vaccine responses both in the B and T cell compartment. In vaccine recipients with prior COVID-19, the first vaccine dose induced high antibody concentrations comparable to seronegative vaccine recipients after two injections. This translated into more efficient neutralisation of virus particles, even more pronounced than expected from the RBD ELISA results. Furthermore, T cell responses were stronger in convalescents and particularly strong against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. Interpretation Herein, we corroborate recent findings suggesting that in convalescents a single vaccine dose is sufficient to boost adequate in vitro neutralisation of SARS-CoV-2 and therefore may be sufficient to induce adequate protection against severe COVID-19. New spike mutated virus variants render the highly conserved nucleocapsid protein – eliciting strong SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell immunity – an interesting additional vaccine target. Funding Christian Doppler Research Association, Johannes Kepler University Linz

Autoinflammatory syndromes (AIS) are characterized by recurring events of inflammation, leading to a variety of organ manifestations and fever attacks. A subgroup of AIS is commonly referred to as hereditary periodic fever syndromes (HPFS). There is substantial evidence that autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus are strongly associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The link between AIS and cardiovascular disease is not that clear, even if the concept of continuous inflammation as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease is widely accepted. Research on the association of AIS and cardiovascular disease is increasing within the last years. In this review, we will discuss the association of several AIS with cardiovascular disease. Based on the rarity of some entities, lack of data, however, led to exclusion of some rare AIS. Especially, for Behcet's disease (BD), adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD), and Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), there is an association with a number of cardiovascular abnormalities. BD is the AIS, which is most strongly associated with manifestation in the arterial and venous system. AOSD is strongly associated with cardiac inflammation (peri-/myocarditis). FMF patients are likely to suffer from serositis. Of note, there seems to be a link between variants of AOSD as well as FMF and idiopathic recurrent acute pericarditis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are at increased risk of infection. Aim of the present study was to investigate whether RA patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) due to infection have higher Rheumatoid Arthritis Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT) risk scores compared to control RA patients. Seventy-four RA patients (32.4% male) admitted to an ICU due to infection (from January 2002 to December 2013) and 74 frequency-matched control RA patients (16.2% male) were included in this cross-sectional study. There was strong evidence for a higher RABBIT risk score in ICU patients (median 2.0; IQR 1.3-3.2) as compared to controls (1.3; IQR 0.8-2.0; p < 0.0001). Traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (82.4 vs 64.9%; p = 0.015) and biological DMARDs (28.4 vs 14.9%; p = 0.012) were more frequently given to RA patients without ICU admission. Glucocorticoid users were more frequently found in the ICU group (51.4 vs 31.1%; p = 0.012). In a multivariable analysis tDMARD use was associated with lower (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.93; p = 0.034) and glucocorticoid use with borderline higher odds of ICU admission (OR 2.05; 95% CI 0.92-4.58; p = 0.078). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2.89; 95% CI 1.10-7.54; p = 0.03), chronic kidney disease (OR 16.08; 95% CI 2.00-129.48; p = 0.009), and age category (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.46-4.87; p = 0.001) were strongly associated with ICU admission. There was a strong trend towards higher odds of ICU admission with increasing RABBIT risk score. Use of tDMARDs was associated with lower odds of ICU admission. In an adjusted analysis, bDMARDs were not associated with ICU admission. COPD, CKD, and age were strong risk factors for ICU admission.

IntroductionProgression of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) leads to irreversible loss of lung function and increased mortality. Based on an institutional ILD registry, we aimed to evaluate biomarkers derived from baseline patient characteristics, computed tomography (CT), and peripheral blood for prognosis of disease progression in fibrotic ILD patients.MethodsOf 209 subsequent ILD-board patients enregistered, 142 had complete follow-up information and were classified fibrotic ILD as defined by presence of reticulation or honeycombing using a standardized semi-quantitative CT evaluation, adding up typical ILD findings in 0–6 defined lung fields. Progression at 1 year was defined as relative loss of ≥10% in forced vital capacity, of ≥15% in diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, death, or lung transplant. Two-thirds of the patients were randomly assigned to a derivation cohort evaluated for the impact of age, sex, baseline lung function, CT finding scores, and blood biomarkers on disease progression. Significant variables were included into a regression model, its results were used to derive a progression-risk score which was then applied to the validation cohort.ResultsIn the derivation cohort, age, monocyte count ≥0.65 G/L, honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis extent had significant impact. Multivariate analyses revealed the variables monocyte count ≥0.65 G/L (1 point) and combined honeycombing or traction bronchiectasis score [0 vs. 1–4 (1 point) vs. 5–6 lung fields (2 points)] as significant, so these were used for score development. In the derivation cohort, resulting scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 accounted for 1-year progression rates of 20, 25, 46.9, and 88.9%, respectively. Similarly, in the validation cohort, progression at 1 year occurred in 0, 23.8, 53.9, and 62.5%, respectively. A score ≥2 showed 70.6% sensitivity and 67.9% specificity, receiver operating characteristic analysis for the scoring model had an area under the curve of 71.7%.ConclusionThe extent of honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis, as well as elevated blood monocyte count predicted progression within 1 year in fibrotic ILD patients.