Hepatocellular adenomas are benign liver neoplasms with specific but varied histopathologic findings and tumor biology. The results from recent studies of the pathologic and genetic basis of hepatocellular adenomas provide important insights into the pathogenesis and molecular changes, as well as the putative oncologic pathways used by diverse adenoma subtypes. On the basis of the genetic and pathologic features, hepatocellular adenomas are categorized into three distinct subtypes: (a) inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas, (b) hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 α-mutated hepatocellular adenomas, and (c) β-catenin-mutated hepatocellular adenomas. Different subtypes show variable clinical behavior, imaging findings, and natural history, and thus the options for treatment and surveillance may vary. Cross-sectional imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis, subtype characterization, identification of complications, and surveillance of hepatocellular adenomas. New schemas for genotype-phenotype classification of hepatic adenomas, as well as management triage of patients with specific subtypes of adenomas, are being proposed in an attempt to improve clinical outcomes.

No abstract

Our initial experience shows a high diagnostic accuracy of PET/MRI in T staging of rectal cancer compared with PET/CT. In addition, PET/MRI shows at least comparable accuracy in N and M staging as well as restaging to PET/CT. However, the small sample size limits the generalizability of the results. It is expected that PET/MRI would yield higher diagnostic accuracy than PET/CT considering the high soft tissue contrast provided by MRI compared with CT, but larger studies are necessary to fully assess the benefit of PET/MRI in colorectal cancer.

MRI plays a critical role in the staging and restaging of rectal cancer. Although newly diagnosed early-stage rectal cancers may immediately be amenable to surgical resection, patients with advanced disease first undergo neoadjuvant therapy that consists of a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Evaluation of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy is best performed with MRI, given its superior soft-tissue contrast and its ability to allow multiplanar imaging and functional evaluation. In this setting, MRI allows accurate evaluation of primary tumor staging, which is determined on the basis of the depth of invasion within and through the rectal wall and the involvement of adjacent organs. MRI can also be used to evaluate posttreatment morphologic components within the tumors, including fibrosis and mucinous changes that have been shown to correlate with the response to treatment. Additional features such as the circumferential resection margin and extramural vascular invasion-factors shown to affect prognosis and local recurrence-are also assessed before and after therapy. Functional assessment with diffusion-weighted MRI and perfusion MRI plays a role in predicting tumor aggressiveness and the likelihood of response to treatment, as well as the extent of residual tumor after therapy. Lymph node staging is also performed at MRI, with assessment of not only lymph node size but also the internal architecture and signal intensity characteristics. ©

Despite new nonsurgical treatment methods for gynecologic diseases (eg, endometrial radiofrequency ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding, uterine artery embolization for uterine fibroids), surgery continues to be the main treatment modality in this setting. New and improved surgical techniques include laparoscopic hysterectomy, which is performed much more frequently than abdominal hysterectomy because it offers the advantages of speedy postsurgical recovery and a short hospital stay. Nevertheless, a number of early and delayed complications continue to occur following gynecologic surgery. Radiologists with access to multiple imaging modalities play an important role in the diagnosis and management of these postsurgical complications and can assist the surgeon at this critical juncture. Improved computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging techniques have made imaging more reliable for early diagnosis. Familiarity with normal postsurgical anatomy, pitfalls in interpretation, and imaging-guided interventional procedures will facilitate the diagnosis and management of complications following gynecologic surgery.