OBJECTIVERotator cuff tears are a common shoulder problem and recently double-row repair techniques have shown superior biomechanical advantages when compared to single-row constructs in a properly selected patient. This study compared 2.8 mm and 4.5 mm anchors with respect to clinical and radiological outcome in two groups of patients. Of course, for the same number of 4.5 anchors used. Volume of Bone Replaced (VBR) will be far less if 2.8 anchors are used in equal number. But, in such surgeries, the ultimate objective was to restore the anatomic footprint and the number of anchors used varied accordingly. MATERIAL AND METHODS50 patients of rotator cuff tear (Size >3 cm) were treated with double-row method of repair arthroscopically. In 25 patients, 2.8 mm anchors were used and in rest 25 patients 4.5 mm anchors were used. Operated patients underwent CT scan of the shoulder during followup period. Using computer software (OsiriX), the cylindrical bone defects made for the anchors were measured by using the formula for volume of the cylinder. For every case, total Volume of Bone Replaced (VBR) was calculated. Since the plane of the anchor cannot always be sagittal or coronal, hence using MPR (Multiplanar reconstruction) tool in OsiriX, a plane was selected in which length of the anchor is the largest meaning that it is the plane parallel to true long axis of the anchor. Radius of the cylinder was calculated in a plane 90 degree to the previously defined plane. RESULTSComparing the two groups, we didn't find any significant difference in the clinical outcome. However, there was a significant difference in one radiological parameter-Volume of Bone Replaced (VBR). CONCLUSIONThere was no difference in clinical recovery in the two groups. However, Volume of Bone Replaced (VBR) was more in 4.5 mm anchor group when compared to 2.8 mm anchor group. This finding can be important to a surgeon when he is operating a re-tear in an already operated double-row patient since there will be a relatively more bone stock available for the surgeon to place additional anchors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.