No abstract

Ground motion amplification has been observed in most earthquakes triggered near the sediment-filled basins such as 2015 Nepal and 1999 Chi–Chi events. Many numerical studies pointed out the effect of various parameters such as material properties and geometric features of the basin on ground motion amplification but the effect of the complete range of source mechanism parameters needs to be addressed. This paper presents the effect of source mechanism parameters, such as strike, dip, rake angle of fault and moment magnitude ([Formula: see text] on amplification of ground motion intensity measures (IMs) due to sediment-filled basins. It is found out that the maximum spectral amplification, when subjected to the source of lateral strike mechanism, is 45, whereas for thrust fault mechanism, it is 30. Within the lateral strike mechanism, if the dip angle is increased from 0∘ to 90∘, the spectral amplification increases from 10 to 30 times. The results also suggested that it is important to consider detailed focal parameters to study basin amplification. The amplification of IMs in the basin is more sensitive to variation of dip angle than the other source parameters and the magnitude of earthquake has an insignificant role in basin amplification.

Deep sedimentary basins often increase the intensity of ground motions, but this effect is not considered explicitly in most codal provisions. The effect of basin amplification on structures to the fragility level is significant to study. For the first time, the effect of basin amplification on Steel Moment Resisting Frames (SMRF) is presented as a function of the basin material and geometry. This paper evaluates the effect of basin material, basin depth, and basin width on Peak Ground Velocity (PGV), Spectral Acceleration (Sa), and fragility of 4, 8, 12, and 20 story steel structures using synthetic ground motions simulated in SPECFEM3D. It has been found that the variation in basin width and impedance ratio can increase the spectral acceleration by a factor of 4 and 2.5, respectively. The response of SMRF is computed by incremental dynamic analysis, and fragility curves are derived for the collapse limit state. Results of fragility analysis reveal that SMRF structure is more fragile to variation in impedance contrast between basin-bedrock. It has been observed from the results that the collapse intensity measure for impedance ratio variation is 40% and 19% lesser on average than the width and depth variation, respectively. Comparison between the present fragility analysis results and HAZUS fragility parameters indicates that the vulnerability of structure located in the basin is underestimated in its current provisions, and the SMRF would need to increase its strength two times to account for basin amplification.

No abstract

No abstract