Abstract-The Statistical Disclosure Attack against a particular user of an anonymity system is known to be very effective in determining, after long-term observation of the system, the set of receivers that user sends messages to. This paper first presents an improvement over this attack that, by employing a weighted mean of the observed relative receiver popularity, is more accurate than the original one based upon arithmetic mean. Second, a mathematical analysis is presented of this attack on a model, in which senders blend dummy messages with real ones. It is shown that despite such sender-generated dummy cover traffic, the attack can proceed almost unhindered. The analysis substantiates earlier empirical indications of the ineffectiveness of this countermeasure.
Abstract.We give a critical analysis of the system-wide anonymity metric of Edman et al. [3], which is based on the permanent value of a doubly-stochastic matrix. By providing an intuitive understanding of the permanent of such a matrix, we show that a metric that looks no further than this composite value is at best a rough indicator of anonymity. We identify situations where its inaccuracy is acute, and reveal a better anonymity indicator. Also, by constructing an information-preserving embedding of a smaller class of attacks into the wider class for which this metric was proposed, we show that this metric fails to possess desirable generalization properties. Finally, we present a new anonymity metric that does not exhibit these shortcomings. Our new metric is accurate as well as general.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.