Background Surgery is the main modality of cure for solid cancers and was prioritised to continue during COVID-19 outbreaks. This study aimed to identify immediate areas for system strengthening by comparing the delivery of elective cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in periods of lockdown versus light restriction. Methods This international, prospective, cohort study enrolled 20 006 adult (≥18 years) patients from 466 hospitals in 61 countries with 15 cancer types, who had a decision for curative surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic and were followed up until the point of surgery or cessation of follow-up (Aug 31, 2020). Average national Oxford COVID-19 Stringency Index scores were calculated to define the government response to COVID-19 for each patient for the period they awaited surgery, and classified into light restrictions (index <20), moderate lockdowns (20–60), and full lockdowns (>60). The primary outcome was the non-operation rate (defined as the proportion of patients who did not undergo planned surgery). Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to explore the associations between lockdowns and non-operation. Intervals from diagnosis to surgery were compared across COVID-19 government response index groups. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04384926 . Findings Of eligible patients awaiting surgery, 2003 (10·0%) of 20 006 did not receive surgery after a median follow-up of 23 weeks (IQR 16–30), all of whom had a COVID-19-related reason given for non-operation. Light restrictions were associated with a 0·6% non-operation rate (26 of 4521), moderate lockdowns with a 5·5% rate (201 of 3646; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·77–0·84; p<0·0001), and full lockdowns with a 15·0% rate (1775 of 11 827; HR 0·51, 0·50–0·53; p<0·0001). In sensitivity analyses, including adjustment for SARS-CoV-2 case notification rates, moderate lockdowns (HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·80–0·88; p<0·001), and full lockdowns (0·57, 0·54–0·60; p<0·001), remained independently associated with non-operation. Surgery beyond 12 weeks from diagnosis in patients without neoadjuvant therapy increased during lockdowns (374 [9·1%] of 4521 in light restrictions, 317 [10·4%] of 3646 in moderate lockdowns, 2001 [23·8%] of 11 827 in full lockdowns), although there were no differences in resectability rates observed with longer delays. Interpretation Cancer surgery systems worldwide were fragile to lockdowns, with one in seven patients who were in regions with full lockdowns not undergoing planned surgery and experiencing longer preoperative delays. Although short-term oncological outcomes were not compromised in those selected for surgery, delays and non-operations might lead to long-term reductions in survival. During current and future periods of societal restriction, the resilience of elective surgery systems requires strengthening, which might include...

13of anorectal melanoma were evaluated in our institution. These patients were identified from the computer data base in our tumor registry using the ICD-O (third edition) site codes for anus and rectum (C21.0, C44.5 and C20.9) and the morphology code for melanoma (M-8720/3). The case records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed in detail to obtain information regarding clinical features (symptoms, duration, investigations and stage), pathological features (size, depth of invasion and immunohistochemical studies), treatment and follow-up details. Depth of the lesion was assessed either by histopathological examination of the surgical specimen or by clinical examination in patients who did not undergo surgery.Immunohistochemistry (IHC), performed by the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method was used to further categorize anorectal tumors labelled on routine Optimizing local control in anorectal melanomaRamakrishnan AS, Mahajan V, Kannan R Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai -600 036, Tamil Nadu, IndiaCorrespondence to: Dr. Ramakrishnan AS, E-mail: ram_a_s@yahoo.com Abstract BACKGROUND: Wide local excision (WLE) of anorectal melanoma is associated with a high incidence of local recurrence.

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients of pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Data collected from members, an independent collaborative group of Indian surgeons specializing in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy (INDEPSO), was analyzed retrospectively. Clinicopathological and perioperative outcomes of patients treated for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) of appendicular origin were evaluated. Ninety-one patients were diagnosed with pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendicular origin between March 2013 and December 2017. The median age was 53 years and 60% were females. The median PCI was 27 [range 3-39] and a CC-0/1 resection was achieved in 83.5% patients. The most common histological grade was low-grade PMP, seen in 71.4% cases. The overall rate of grades 3-4 morbidity was 33% (30/91) and the 90-day mortality rate reported was 6.5%. Pulmonary complications and systemic sepsis emerged as the most significant factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and failure to rescue. At a median follow-up of 24 months, the median OS was not reached and the median PFS was 53 months. On univariate and multivariate analysis, high-grade histology, prior chemotherapy, debulking surgery alone without HIPEC, and high PCI > 10 were predictors of poor progression-free survival. The survival and morbidity results of pseudomyxoma peritonei from appendicular origin following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy are encouraging. With further awareness and understanding of the disease, and improvement in surgical expertise and learning curve, there is scope for further reduction in morbidity and better improvement in survival.

There are various registries for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) that aid pooling of data and generate evidence that dictates current clinical practice. This manuscript describes the setting up of the Indian HIPEC registry that was set up with a similar goal by a group of Indian surgeons. This is a registry for patients with PM treated with CRS and HIPEC in India. It also acts as a database for storing treatment-related information. Patients with PM from colorectal ovarian, gastric, appendiceal tumors, and other rare peritoneal tumors/metastases from rare tumors are enrolled in the registry. A coordinator updates the disease status of patients on a yearly basis. A private organization maintains the database. A non-disclosure agreement is signed between the company and each surgeon contributing to the registry to maintain confidentiality. For enrolling patients, securing institutional permission depends on the requirement of each institute; patient consent is mandatory. Data entry can be prospective or retrospective. To propose and conduct a study, the approval of a scientific committee linked to the registry is required. The Indian HIPEC registry is a practical database for Indian surgeons. There is no regulatory body that mandates collection and publication of scientific data in India. The onus is on each surgeon to capture valuable information pertaining to these common and rare diseases that could contribute to the existing scientific knowledge and guide the treatment of these patients in the future. The next challenge will be to enter data into the registry.

Composite adenocarcinoma-carcinoid tumors have been described in the esophagus, stomach, ampulla of Vater and in the colon. These form a distinct pathologic entity in a spectrum of tumors ranging from the pure adenocarcinoma to the pure carcinoid. The biologic behavior, treatment and prognosis of these tumors is determined by the glandular component. We describe two varied clinical presentations in this spectrum, to bring into focus this clinical and pathologic chimera.