The high incidence of sunlight-induced human skin cancers reveals a need for more effective photosensitizing agents. In this study, we compared the efficacy of prophylactic photodynamic therapy (PDT) when methylene blue (MB), riboflavin (RF), or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) were used as photosensitizers. All mice in four groups of female C3.Cg/TifBomTac hairless immunocompetent mice (N = 100) were irradiated with three standard erythema doses of solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation (UVR) thrice weekly. Three groups received 2 × 2 prophylactic PDT treatments (days 45 + 52 and 90 + 97). The PDT treatments consisted of topical administration of 16% MAL, 20% MB, or 20% RF, and subsequent illumination that matched the photosensitizers’ absorption spectra. Control mice received no PDT. We recorded when the first, second, and third skin tumors developed. The pattern of tumor development after MB-PDT or RF-PDT was similar to that observed in irradiated control mice (p > 0.05). However, the median times until the first, second, and third skin tumors developed in mice given MAL-PDT were significantly delayed, compared with control mice (256, 265, and 272 vs. 215, 222, and 230 days, respectively; p < 0.001). Only MAL-PDT was an effective prophylactic treatment against UVR-induced skin tumors in hairless mice.
Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is a frequently prescribed diuretic that exhibits photosensitizing properties. It is used to treat hypertension and edema. Dermato‐epidemiological studies in various populations have linked HCTZ treatment with increased risk of particular types of skin cancer, including malignant melanoma (lentigo subtype), and both basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This study investigated whether either of two different doses of HCTZ increased the risk of SCC development in mice exposed to ultraviolet radiation (UVR). A total of three groups of hairless mice were used in this study (total, N = 71). One group received a low dose (0.26 mg/mouse/day) and another group received a high dose (0.52 mg/mouse/day) of HCTZ in their drinking water; a third UVR control group received only tap water. All three groups were irradiated with UVR until the mice developed three tumours that were 4 mm in size. The times to SCC tumour development were recorded. In the low‐dose group, the median time to develop an SCC tumour was 170 days; in both the high‐dose group and the control group, the median time to develop anexd SCC tumour was 163 days (p ≥ 0.331). In our hairless mouse model, we found that mice treated with UVR plus HCTZ did not develop SCCs more rapidly than mice treated with UVR but not HCTZ.
PUVA is a treatment that combines oral methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) with ultraviolet radiation A (UVA). It is used for severe psoriasis and the early stages of T-cell lymphoma. X-rays are an effective treatment for skin cancers. Both treatments are in higher doses used to treat skin malignancies and simultaneously increase the risk of keratinocyte cancer. The main objective of this study was to test whether a few PUVA or X-ray treatments could delay the development of ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced skin tumors in a well-established hairless mouse model. Three groups of immunocompetent mice (total, N = 75) were included in the study. All groups were UVR-exposed during the study period. In addition, one group was treated with PUVA and another group was treated with X-rays at days 45, 52, 90 and 97. A control group was treated with UVR only. We recorded when the first, second and third skin tumors were induced in each mouse. Skin tumors developed significantly earlier in both the PUVA and X-ray groups (median, 188 days) than in the control mice (median, 215 days; p < 0.001). Therefore, a few X-ray and PUVA treatments both significantly accelerated the development of skin tumors in hairless mice, compared to UVR controls. Neither treatment showed a delay of UVR-induced skin tumors and caution should be exercised before applying these treatments to sun-damaged skin.
Common skin disorders such as acne vulgaris, rosacea and folliculitis are bothersome prevalent inflammatory diseases of hair follicles that can easily be investigated bedside using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) with micrometre resolution, opening a novel era for high‐resolution hair follicle diagnostics and quantitative treatment evaluation. EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science were searched until 5 January 2023 to identify all studies imaging hair follicle characteristics by RCM and OCT for diagnosis and monitoring of treatment in hair follicle‐based skin disorders. This study followed PRISMA guidelines. After inclusion of articles, methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS‐2 critical appraisal checklist. Thirty‐nine in vivo studies (33 RCM and 12 OCT studies) were included. The studies focused on acne vulgaris, rosacea, alopecia areata, hidradenitis suppurativa, folliculitis, folliculitis decalvans, lichen planopilaris, discoid lupus erythemasus, frontal fibrosing alopecia and keratosis pilaris. Inter‐ and perifollicular morphology including number of demodex mites, hyperkeratinization, inflammation and vascular morphology could be assessed by RCM and OCT in all included skin disorders. Methodological study quality was low, and interstudy outcome variability was high. Quality assessment showed high or unclear risk of bias in 36 studies. Both RCM and OCT visualize quantitative features as size, shape, content and abnormalities of hair follicles, and have potential to support clinical diagnosis and evaluate treatment effects. However, larger studies with better methodological quality are needed to implement RCM and OCT directly into clinical practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.