Objective:Recent studies have tried to find a reliable way of predicting the development of Alzheimer´s Disease (AD) among patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), often focusing on olfactory dysfunction or semantic memory. Our study aimed to validate these findings while also comparing the predictive accuracy of olfactory and semantic assessments for this purpose.Method:Six hundred fifty patients (median age 68, 58% females) including controls, SCD (subjective cognitive decline), non-amnestic MCI (naMCI), amnestic MCI (aMCI), and AD patients were tested for olfactory dysfunction by means of odor identification testing and semantic memory. Of those 650 patients, 120 participants with SCD, naMCI, or aMCI at baseline underwent a follow-up examination after two years on average. Of these 120 patients, 12% had developed AD at follow-up (converters), while 88% did not develop AD at follow-up (non-converters).Results:Analysis showed a significant difference only for initial olfactory identification between converters and non-converters. Sensitivity of impairment of olfactory identification for AD prediction was low at 46.2%, although specificity was high at 81.9%. Semantic memory impairment at baseline was not significantly related to AD conversion, although, when naming objects, significant differences were found between AD patients and all other groups and between naMCI and aMCI patients compared to controls and SCD patients.Conclusions:Objective olfactory assessments are promising instruments for predicting the conversion to AD among MCI patients. However, due to their low sensitivity and high specificity, a combination with other neuropsychological tests might lead to an improved predictive accuracy. Further longitudinal studies with more participants are required to investigate the usefulness of semantic memory tests in this case.

Objective: Olfactory impairment is a very common symptom in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, individuals often overestimate their ability to smell. Hyposmia and metacognitive errors are also related to aging, depression, male gender and cognitive impairment. The current study investigated the awareness of olfactory functioning in PD and the influence of additional factors. Method: A sample of 124 nondemented PD patients and 154 elderly controls was assessed with the Sniffin’ Sticks Odor Identification Test (OIT) and the Subjective Olfactory Capability (SOC) domain of the Assessment of Self-Reported Olfactory Functioning and Olfaction-Related Quality of Life, additional to measures of depressive symptoms, verbal memory and executive functioning. Olfactory awareness groups were formed by means of the cut-offs of the OIT and the SOC. Results: Significant correlations between the OIT and the SOC were moderate in participants with PD and small in controls. Of all PD patients, 52% overrated their sense of smell while 27% correctly identified themselves as being hyposmic, as opposed to corresponding 6% and 1% of healthy elderly. Overrating and aware of being hyposmic participants with PD showed worse executive functions than PD patients who were objectively and subjectively normosmic. Conclusions: The findings imply that, although people with PD are aware of hyposmia to some extent, the majority is affected by overestimation of the ability to smell, making self-reported functioning an unreliable source of information. Moreover, reduced odor identification and impaired executive functioning might underlie the same pathological changes within the brain and could serve as a marker for cognitive impairment in PD.

Introduction Hyposmia and metacognitive errors are related to aging, depression, male gender, and cognitive decline. The current study investigated the awareness of olfactory dysfunction in subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD), as well as the influence of additional factors. Methods A sample of 641 patients, including controls, SCD, non-amnestic MCI (naMCI), amnestic MCI (aMCI), and AD patients, was assessed with the Sniffin' Sticks odor identification test (OIT) and the subjective olfactory capability (SOC) scale, in addition to measures of depressive symptoms, verbal memory, and executive functioning. Olfactory awareness groups were formed by means of the cutoffs of the OIT and the SOC. Results Moderate and small, although significant, correlations between the OIT and the SOC were found among the study groups, with a significant discrimination of measured olfactory function via subjective assessment existing among controls but not among patients with AD. Of all AD patients, 34% overrated their sense of smell while 21% correctly identified themselves as being hyposmic, as opposed to corresponding 6% and 1% of healthy elderly. Overraters and correct hyposmic participants showed higher age and worse verbal memory and executive functions. Conclusions Reduced odor identification might underlie the same pathological changes within the brain as cognitive impairment and could serve as an additional marker for the development of AD. Implications Although people with AD are aware of hyposmia to some extent, the majority is affected by overestimation of the ability to smell, making the combination of subjective ratings and measures of olfactory function an interesting topic for further research.