TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractThe permeability, pore pressure, and leakoff-type interpreted from more than 1,200 diagnostic fracture-injection/falloff tests were collected in a database and statistically evaluated for four Rocky Mountain basins. The statistical analysis includes the range of observed permeability and pore pressure and the fracture leakoff-type distribution.Specially designed "mini-frac" or diagnostic fractureinjection/falloff tests were routinely implemented throughout Rocky Mountain basins beginning in late 1998 for the sole purpose of estimating reservoir-engineering parameters. Using three recently developed analysis methodologies, more than 1,200 tests have been analyzed to determine permeability, pore pressure, and leakoff type.The analysis reveals that pressure-dependent leakoff, fracture-tip extension during shut-in, and fracture heightrecession during shut-in are the most common leakoff types. Overall, pressure-dependent leakoff, which can be indicative of highly productive fractured reservoirs, is the most common leakoff type in all Rocky Mountain basins. The analysis also shows order-of-magnitude variation in gas permeability within all basins with observed gas permeability ranging from less than 0.001 md to greater than 0.10 md.
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractWells completed by the openhole cavity technique in the Fruitland formation of the fairway zone in the San Juan basin have demonstrated gas production rates nearly ten times greater than production rates from wells completed by fracturing in the same area, but expensive trial and error selection of wells to cavity complete outside the fairway and in other basins must be made. Data from numerous wells were obtained from four companies active in the basin. Five parameters namely in-situ stress, bottom-hole pressure, ash content, volatile matter, and depth to the top of the Fruitland coalseams were statistically ranked by their importance to the success of cavity completion techniques, and these five parameters were contoured using the "Surfer" software. From the resulting contours, boundaries of fairway zones similar to that of the San Juan basin can now be defined in unexplored basins. This study is the first to assimilate enough minimum in-situ stress data in the San Juan basin to statistically correlate with production rates. The statistical analysis shows minimum in-situ stress to be the most important parameter of the five studied for successful cavity completions. A threshold minimum in-situ stress between 2080-2359 psi is required if other parameters of the study are satisfactory. The study is important for coalbed methane development around the world where coalseams as successful as the San Juan fairway are sought for the application of cavity completions.
TX 7508 3-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractHistorically, Fruitland coal wells in the Tiffany area of the San Juan basin have to be hydraulically fractured to be economical. The need for artificial stimulation is that the Tiffany area coals are characterized by lower permeability than the coals in the San Juan basin "fairway" to the south. The post-stimulation gas and water production rates in the Tiffany area vary approximately from 50 to 250 Mcf/D and 40 to 500 BWPD respectively, but not all stimulated wells are economically successful. A study was initiated to develop a better understanding of the reservoir characteristics and completion effectiveness for the purpose of optimizing production from the Fruitland coals in the Tiffany area.Public domain 1,2 production data was used to determine the average gas and water production rates for Fruitland coal wells in the project area. This data was combined with a detailed working geologic model for use in reservoir simulation analysis. History-matching the a verage well production resulted in the identification of several critical well performance issues: 1) the top Fruitland coal is not receiving treatment with the single-stage completion, 2) the basal Fruitland coal is not being effectively completed, 3) the basal Fruitland coal and the underlying Pictured Cliff sandstone is receiving most of the fracturing treatment, and 4) water production that does not show any significant decline is probably a result of contribution from the water-wet, lowerpermeability Pictured Cliff sandstone underlying the basal Fruitland coal.Based on these significant findings, stimulation treatments have been completely revised. The top and basal Fruitland coals are now being treated separately at lower rates so that only the coals and not the water-wet, Pictured Cliff sandstone is stimulated. In addition, the perforations are now being carefully placed in the middle of the coal interval leaving one to two ft. at the top and bottom boundaries. In the wells that were orig inally stimu lated with a single-stage treatment, the top Fruitland coal is being restimulated. The results obtained from these modifications have been substantial. In the four wells that were restimulated, a minimum of 100%, to a maximum of approximately 400% increase in gas production rates were observed. Water production has decreased in most of the wells to less than 50 BWPD since only the coals are being dewatered and not the water-wet Pictured Cliff sandstone. In some of the new wells, even though there is a high initial water rate, it clearly shows a declining trend unlike the old wells completed with high rate, one-stage stimulation treatments. In addition, these new wells produce substantially higher gas rates when compared to the old wells. Specific examples f rom the project area are presented to show the effectiveness of the new stimulation procedures. Although the results of this study are specific to the Tiffany area, the methodology and techniques used can be applied effectively in other coalbed m...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.