Objective: To examine the persistence of the original treatment effects 10 years after the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) in the follow-up Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. In the DCCT, intensive therapy aimed at nearnormal glycemia reduced the risk of microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus compared with conventional therapy.Methods: Retinopathy was evaluated by fundus photography in 1211 subjects at EDIC year 10. Further 3-step progression on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study scale from DCCT closeout was the primary outcome.Results: After 10 years of EDIC follow-up, there was no significant difference in mean glycated hemoglobin levels (8.07% vs 7.98%) between the original treatment groups. Nevertheless, compared with the former conven-tional treatment group, the former intensive group had significantly lower incidences from DCCT close of further retinopathy progression and proliferative retinopathy or worse (hazard reductions, 53%-56%; PϽ.001). The risk (hazard) reductions at 10 years of EDIC were attenuated compared with the 70% to 71% over the first 4 years of EDIC (PϽ.001). The persistent beneficial effects of former intensive therapy were largely explained by the difference in glycated hemoglobin levels during DCCT.
Conclusion:The persistent difference in diabetic retinopathy between former intensive and conventional therapy ("metabolic memory") continues for at least 10 years but may be waning.
A phase I trial of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) was conducted to establish the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of ATRA given once daily to patients with solid tumors. Cancer patients for whom no standard therapy was available were treated with ATRA once daily. Doses were escalated in cohorts of at least three patients. The pharmacokinetics of ATRA were assessed on day 1 for all patients and weekly for 31 patients who received doses of > or = 110 mg/m2 per day. Patients were followed for toxicity and response. Correlations of toxicity frequency and grade with pharmacokinetic parameters were sought. In addition, correlation of changes in ATRA pharmacokinetics with the concentration of ATRA metabolites in plasma were sought. A total of 49 patients received ATRA at doses ranging from 45 to 309 mg/m2 per day. Hypertriglyceridemia was dose-limiting at 269 mg/m2 per day. Other frequent toxicities included mucocutaneous dryness and headache. With chronic dosing, plasma ATRA concentrations fell in 59% of patients. Stable, low, or variable [ATRA] were seen in 16%, 6%, and 16% of patients respectively. Age, gender, smoking, or concurrent medication did not correlate with the pharmacokinetic pattern. Severe toxicities tended to occur with initial peak [ATRA] of > or = 0.5 microgram/ml (1.7 microM), and the toxicity frequency did not change if [ATRA] decreased with continued dosing. No consistent change in 4-oxo-ATRA or retinoid glucuronide concentrations was observed with decreases in plasma [ATRA]. The recommended once-daily ATRA dose is 215 mg/m2, although significant interpatient variability is observed in toxicity and plasma retinoid concentrations. Although not statistically significant, more frequent and severe toxicity tended to occur in patients with higher plasma peak ATRA concentrations. Other factors, such as responses at target tissues, may be at least as important as the plasma ATRA concentration in predicting toxicity and/or response.
We have characterized all toxicities with suramin in a pharmacologically guided phase I study designed to maintain plasma suramin concentrations of 100 to 300 micrograms/mL (cohorts 1 to 3). The incidence of grade 3 to 4 neurologic abnormalities was relatively low, particularly in cohorts 2 and 3 (100 to 250 micrograms/mL). Evidence of significant and durable antitumor activity was seen in all three cohorts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.