Background. In Egypt more than one-third of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases occur in individuals aged 40 years and younger, and are diagnosed at advanced stages; currently, CRC screening is not done as a routine part of preventive care. To lay the foundation for the development of a CRC multilevel screening program in Egypt, this qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives of Egyptian physicians. Materials and Methods. The PRECEDE-PROCEED model, which focuses on predisposing (intrapersonal), reinforcing (interpersonal), and enabling (structural) factors inherent in health behaviors, served as our theoretical framework. Primary health care physicians, oncologists, and gastroenterologists practicing in Alexandria, Egypt, participated in 1 one-hour semistructured interview. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, translated into English, and analyzed by thematic analysis. Results. Seventeen physicians participated (n = 8 specialists and n = 9 primary care physicians). Barriers to CRC screening included socioeconomic status, a lack of emphasis on prevention, fear, and cost (predisposing); a belief that only high risk patients should be screened and a lack of confidence in providers to perform and interpret screening tests appropriately (reinforcing); and cost, lack of availability of the tests, and inadequate training for laboratory technicians and providers (enabling). Potential facilitators included implementing a media campaign emphasizing early detection, curability and prevention (predisposing); educating physicians and eliciting physician engagement (reinforcing); and decreasing costs, making screening tests widely available, and providing well-trained providers (enabling). Conclusion. A CRC screening program is needed in Egypt, and to be successful it would likely need to address barriers at multiple levels. The Oncologist 2020;25:e1525-e1531 Implications for Practice: In Egypt, colorectal screening is not a routine part of preventive care, and colorectal cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage in individuals aged 40 years or younger. Screening can prevent and detect colorectal cancer in its early stages, but before designing any screening program, understanding the context is important as cultural beliefs may impact the acceptability of screening methods. By exploring the perspectives of Egyptian physicians, this study found important insights into how screening program components should be considered in the Egyptian culture and lays the foundation for the development of a multilevel colorectal screening program in Egypt.

No abstract

Background Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) and gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) are two different pathologies that cause bleeding in cirrhotic patients. These two pathologies are still difficult to be distinguished by white light endoscopy (conventional), as they both appear as red spots in the gastric antral mucosa in the case of severe PHG. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of Versatile Intelligent Staining Technology (VIST) in comparison to histopathology in the diagnosis and classification of GAVE. Methods A cross-sectional study included 50 patients with liver cirrhosis recruited from Alexandria Main University Hospital. Patients with connective tissue diseases and chronic kidney disease were excluded. All patients were examined by both conventional white light endoscopy (WLE) and image enhancement technology (VIST) using Sonoscape HD500 endoscope. GAVE was diagnosed as tortuous columns of ectatic vessels in the gastric antrum. Histopathological examination was used as the standard tool for the diagnosis of GAVE. Results A total of 50 patients were included, 28 patients (56 %) were diagnosed as GAVE by pathology vs 22 (44 %) as non-GAVE. Twenty-three of 28 (78.6 %) cases of GAVE were detected by VIST. VIST had superior sensitivity than WLE in the detection of GAVE, 82.1 % vs 7.1 %, while WLE had higher specificity 95.5 % vs 59.1 % by VIST. There was statistical significance between VIST and pathology in the diagnosis of GAVE, p<0.035, but no statistical significance between WLE and pathology. VIST has identified two types of GAVE: focal in 12/28 cases and diffuse in 11/28, and five were not diagnosed by VIST. Conclusions Versatile Intelligent Staining Technology could be used as an alternative tool to histopathological diagnosis of GAVE. GAVE can present as a focal group of ectatic vessels which adds a new class to GAVE classification that was previously misdiagnosed.

PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is not routinely performed in Egypt, and more than one third of CRC cases occur in individuals age 40 and younger, with overall survival estimated at only 2 years, presumably because of late diagnoses. To lay the foundation for the development of a CRC multilevel screening program in Egypt to promote CRC prevention and early detection, this qualitative study aimed to explore the potential barriers to and facilitators of screening from the perspectives of physicians and residents in Alexandria. METHODS We conducted one-on-one, 1-hour, semistructured interviews with primary health care physicians and specialists—oncologists and gastroenterologists—practicing in Alexandria, Egypt. Focus groups of residents, stratified by social class and gender, were also held. Interviews and focus groups were conducted in Arabic by trained interviewers/moderator, and were audio recorded, transcribed, translated into English, and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Seventeen physicians participated—8 specialists and 9 primary care physicians—and 7 focus groups—7 to 8 participants each—were held. According to both interview and focus group participants, individual-level barriers to CRC screening included socioeconomic status, a lack of emphasis on prevention in the culture, fear, and cost. Provider-level barriers as mentioned by physicians included a belief that only high-risk patients should be screened and a lack of confidence in providers to perform and interpret screening tests appropriately. Structural-level barriers, discussed by physicians and focus group participants, included cost and a lack of testing availability. Potential facilitators of screening mentioned by physicians included implementing a media campaign emphasizing early detection and curability. Focus group participants focused on making screening tests free or low cost, obligatory, and convenient. CONCLUSION On the basis of the perceptions of physicians and residents of Alexandria, Egypt, multiple barriers to and facilitators of CRC screening exist. Addressing these would be important in designing a successful screening program.