The ability to provide timely identification of the causative agents of lower respiratory tract infections can promote better patient outcomes and support antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Current diagnostic testing options include culture, molecular testing, and antigen detection. These methods may require collection of various specimens, involve extensive sample treatment, and can suffer from low sensitivity and long turnaround times. This study assessed the performance of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PN panel) and Pneumonia Plus Panel (PNplus panel), an FDA-cleared sample-to-answer assay that enables the detection of viruses, atypical bacteria, bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance marker genes from lower respiratory tract specimens (sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] fluid). Semiquantitative results are also provided for the bacterial targets. This paper describes selected analytical and clinical studies that were conducted to evaluate performance of the panel for regulatory clearance. Prospectively collected respiratory specimens (846 BAL and 836 sputum specimens) evaluated with the PN panel were also tested by quantitative reference culture and molecular methods for comparison. The PN panel showed a sensitivity of 100% for 15/22 etiologic targets using BAL specimens and for 10/24 using sputum specimens. All other targets had sensitivities of ≥75% or were unable to be calculated due to low prevalence in the study population. Specificity for all targets was ≥87.2%, with many false-positive results compared to culture that were confirmed by alternative molecular methods. Appropriate adoption of this test could provide actionable diagnostic information that is anticipated to impact patient care and antimicrobial stewardship decisions.

48 Background. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are the primary means of 49 identifying acute infections caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 50 (SARS-CoV-2). Accurate and fast test results may permit more efficient use of protective and 51 isolation resources and allow for rapid therapeutic interventions. 52 Methods. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance characteristics of the Xpert ® 53 Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Xpert) test, a rapid, automated molecular test for SARS-CoV-2. 54 Analytical sensitivity and specificity/interference were assessed with infectious SARS-CoV-2, 55 other infectious coronavirus species including SARS-CoV, and 85 nasopharyngeal swab 56 specimens positive for other respiratory viruses including endemic human coronaviruses 57 (hCoVs). Clinical performance was assessed using 483 remnant upper and lower respiratory 58 specimens previously analyzed by standard of care (SOC) NAATs. 59 Results. The limit of detection of the Xpert test was 0.01 plaque forming units (PFU)/mL. 60 Other hCoVs, including Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus, were not detected by 61 the Xpert test. SARS-CoV, a closely related species in the Sarbecovirus subgenus, was 62 detected by a broad-range target (E) but was distinguished from SARS-CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2-63 specific N2 target). Compared to SOC NAATs, the positive agreement of the Xpert test was 64 219/220 (99.5%) and the negative agreement was 250/261 (95.8%). A third tie-breaker 65 NAAT resolved all but three of the discordant results in favor the Xpert test. 66 Conclusions. The Xpert test provided sensitive and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a 67 variety of upper and lower respiratory tract specimens. The high sensitivity and fast time to 68 results of approximately 45 minutes may impact patient management. 69 70 Laboratory diagnosis of infections caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 72 (SARS-CoV-2) is usually accomplished by performing nucleic acid amplification tests 73 (NAATs) on respiratory tract specimens. An antibody response is often not detected in the 74 first week to ten days of symptoms and antibody testing is therefore generally unhelpful for 75 acute diagnosis(1-3), with virus isolation in culture presenting significant biosafety risks. 76 Upper respiratory tract (URT) specimens such as nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and 77 oropharyngeal swabs (OPS) generally have high SARS-CoV-2 viral loads upon symptom 78 onset.(2, 4-6) URT specimens may also have detectable RNA during the pre-symptomatic 79 period(7), and pediatric patients who remain asymptomatic through the entire course of 80 on June 9, 2020 by guest http://jcm.asm.org/ Downloaded from 4 infection can persistently shed RNA in URT specimens for two weeks or longer.(4, 8) 81 Importantly, NPS may have higher viral loads than OPS.(6) Lower respiratory tract (LRT) 82 specimens including sputum(7, 9) and tracheal aspirates(10) (TA) are often positive for RNA 83 early in disease and remain positive longer than URT sources.(5) 84 NAATs are...

Lower respiratory tract infections, including hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia, are common in hospitalized patient populations. Standard methods frequently fail to identify the infectious etiology due to the polymicrobial nature of respiratory specimens and the necessity of ordering specific tests to identify viral agents. The potential severity of these infections combined with a failure to clearly identify the causative pathogen results in administration of empirical antibiotic agents based on clinical presentation and other risk factors. We examined the impact of the multiplexed, semiquantitative BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia panel (PN panel) test on laboratory reporting for 259 adult inpatients submitting bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens for laboratory analysis. The PN panel demonstrated a combined 96.2% positive percent agreement (PPA) and 98.1% negative percent agreement (NPA) for the qualitative identification of 15 bacterial targets compared to routine bacterial culture. Semiquantitative values reported by the PN panel were frequently higher than values reported by culture, resulting in semiquantitative agreement (within the same log10 value) of 43.6% between the PN panel and culture; however, all bacterial targets reported as >105 CFU/ml in culture were reported as ≥105 genomic copies/ml by the PN panel. Viral targets were identified by the PN panel in 17.7% of specimens tested, of which 39.1% were detected in conjunction with a bacterial target. A review of patient medical records, including clinically prescribed antibiotics, revealed the potential for antibiotic adjustment in 70.7% of patients based on the PN panel result, including discontinuation or de-escalation in 48.2% of patients, resulting in an average savings of 6.2 antibiotic days/patient.

No abstract

Next-generation sequencing technologies are being rapidly adopted as a tool of choice for diagnostic and outbreak investigation in public health laboratories. However, costs of operation and the need for specialized staff remain major hurdles for laboratories with limited resources for implementing these technologies. This project aimed to assess the feasibility of using Oxford Nanopore MinION whole-genome sequencing data of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates for species identification, in silico spoligotyping, detection of mutations associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to accurately predict drug susceptibility profiles, and phylogenetic analysis to detect transmission between cases. The results were compared prospectively in real-time, to those obtained with our current clinically validated Illumina MiSeq sequencing assay for M. tuberculosis and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing results when available. Our assessment of 431 sequenced samples over a 32-week period demonstrates that, when using the proper quality controls and thresholds, the MinION can achieve levels of genotyping analysis and phenotypic resistance predictions comparable to those of the Illumina MiSeq, at a very competitive cost per sample. Our results indicate that nanopore sequencing can be a suitable alternative to, or complement, currently used sequencing platforms in a clinical setting and has the potential to be widely adopted in public health laboratories in the near future.